Real-world efficacy and safety of iruplinalkib in <i>ALK</i> -positive advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients previously treated with lorlatinib.

e20730 Background: Treatment options after lorlatinib failure remain limited in patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase ( ALK )-positive advanced lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Iruplinalkib (WX-0593) has shown systemic and intracranial activity. We report updated results with extended follow-up from a real-world study evaluating iruplinalkib in this setting. Methods: Patients with ALK -positive advanced LUAD who received iruplinalkib after progression on or intolerance to lorlatinib were included. The primary endpoint was real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS). Secondary endpoints included real-world objective response rate (rwORR), disease control rate (rwDCR), overall survival (OS), and safety. Data cutoff was December 31, 2025 (ChiCTR2600116971). Results: Sixteen heavily pretreated patients were included, with a median of 4 prior systemic therapy lines (range 2–7); 81.3% (13/16) had baseline brain metastases. Iruplinalkib was administered as monotherapy in 62.5% of patients , while 37.5% received combination therapies based on physician discretion. With a median follow-up of 15.8 months, the rwORR was 31.3% (5/16) and rwDCR was 87.5% (14/16). The median PFS was 12.4 months (95% CI: 7.66–NE). The median OS reached 22.1 months (95% CI: 22.1–NE), although OS data remain immature. Safety profiles were consistent with previous reports. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 12.5% of patients, with no new safety signals observed. Conclusions: In this updated analysis, iruplinalkib demonstrated durable clinical efficacy in heavily pretreated ALK -positive LUAD patients progressing on lorlatinib, including those with a high burden of brain metastases. The median PFS of 12.4 months and OS of 22.1 months in a ≥ 4 th -line setting supports iruplinalkib as a promising salvage option. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR2600116971. Baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes. Parameters Results (N=16) Baseline Characteristics Age (median, range) 48.5 (34.00-63.00) Sex Male 6 (37.5%) Female 10 (62.5%) ECOG PS 0-1 12 (75.0%) ≥2 4 (25.0%) Baseline brain metastasis 13 (81.3%) Prior ALK TKIs Crizotinib + 2nd-generation TKIs + lorlatinib 13 (81.3%) 2nd-generation TKIs + lorlatinib 3 (18.8%) Prior 2nd-generation ALK TKI Aletinib 12 (75.0%) Ceritinib 6 (37.5%) Brigatinib 4 (25.0%) Ensartinib 5 (31.3%) Other Prior Therapies Prior chemotherapy 9 (56.3%) Prior anti-angiogenesis 10 (62.5%) Prior immune checkpoint inhibitor 2 (12.5%) Efficacy Partial response 5 (31.3%) Stable disease 9 (56.3%) Progressive disease 1 (6.3%)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.e20730
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-world efficacy and safety of iruplinalkib in ALK -positive advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients previously treated with lorlatinib.

Li Zhu, S M Wang, Daying Wu, Wanzhong Huang et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
article

Real-world efficacy and safety of iruplinalkib in ALK -positive advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients previously treated with lorlatinib.

Li Zhu, S M Wang, Daying Wu, Wanzhong Huang, Lue Zhou, Fen Wang, Xiuyu Cai, Xiang Long, Qiushan He, Yalei Zhang
article en

Abstract

e20730 Background: Treatment options after lorlatinib failure remain limited in patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase ( ALK )-positive advanced lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Iruplinalkib (WX-0593) has shown systemic and intracranial activity. We report updated results with extended follow-up from a real-world study evaluating iruplinalkib in this setting. Methods: Patients with ALK -positive advanced LUAD who received iruplinalkib after progression on or intolerance to lorlatinib were included. The primary endpoint was real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS). Secondary endpoints included real-world objective response rate (rwORR), disease control rate (rwDCR), overall survival (OS), and safety. Data cutoff was December 31, 2025 (ChiCTR2600116971). Results: Sixteen heavily pretreated patients were included, with a median of 4 prior systemic therapy lines (range 2–7); 81.3% (13/16) had baseline brain metastases. Iruplinalkib was administered as monotherapy in 62.5% of patients , while 37.5% received combination therapies based on physician discretion. With a median follow-up of 15.8 months, the rwORR was 31.3% (5/16) and rwDCR was 87.5% (14/16). The median PFS was 12.4 months (95% CI: 7.66–NE). The median OS reached 22.1 months (95% CI: 22.1–NE), although OS data remain immature. Safety profiles were consistent with previous reports. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 12.5% of patients, with no new safety signals observed. Conclusions: In this updated analysis, iruplinalkib demonstrated durable clinical efficacy in heavily pretreated ALK -positive LUAD patients progressing on lorlatinib, including those with a high burden of brain metastases. The median PFS of 12.4 months and OS of 22.1 months in a ≥ 4 th -line setting supports iruplinalkib as a promising salvage option. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR2600116971. Baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes. Parameters Results (N=16) Baseline Characteristics Age (median, range) 48.5 (34.00-63.00) Sex Male 6 (37.5%) Female 10 (62.5%) ECOG PS 0-1 12 (75.0%) ≥2 4 (25.0%) Baseline brain metastasis 13 (81.3%) Prior ALK TKIs Crizotinib + 2nd-generation TKIs + lorlatinib 13 (81.3%) 2nd-generation TKIs + lorlatinib 3 (18.8%) Prior 2nd-generation ALK TKI Aletinib 12 (75.0%) Ceritinib 6 (37.5%) Brigatinib 4 (25.0%) Ensartinib 5 (31.3%) Other Prior Therapies Prior chemotherapy 9 (56.3%) Prior anti-angiogenesis 10 (62.5%) Prior immune checkpoint inhibitor 2 (12.5%) Efficacy Partial response 5 (31.3%) Stable disease 9 (56.3%) Progressive disease 1 (6.3%)

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Southern University of Science and Technology (CN), Longgang Central Hospital (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University (CN), ShenZhen People’s Hospital (CN), Peking University Shenzhen Hospital (CN), University of Hong Kong - Shenzhen Hospital (CN), Southern Medical University Shenzhen Hospital (CN), Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (CN), Shenzhen Second People's Hospital (CN), Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou Medical University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.