The impact of online CME on addressing clinical decision-making for immunotherapy in advanced squamous NSCLC.

e21002 Background: Immunotherapy (IO)-based regimens are foundational to the management of advanced squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Effective clinical application requires accurate interpretation of emerging trial data, integration of patient- and disease-specific considerations, and informed selection among available regimens. Given the multidisciplinary nature of NSCLC care, baseline understanding and practical readiness to apply immunotherapy data may vary across oncologists, pathologists, and pulmonologists. The objective of this study was to assess the educational impact of a single continuing medical education (CME) activity on clinicians’ recognition of the role of IO in advanced squamous NSCLC and treatment decisions. Methods: The educational intervention presented included an online, CME-certified video discussion between two expert faculty. Educational impact was assessed with repeated paired pre-/post-assessment study design, where individual participants served as their own control. Outcomes were analyzed by learning objective and stratified by specialty (oncologists, pathologists, and pulmonologists). A McNemar’s test assessed significant levels of changes reported with P values <.05 considered statistically significant. The activity launched September 2025; data were collected until January 2026. Results: Across specialties, participation in CME was associated with improvements in post-education performance (Table). Exploratory analyses demonstrated that frequency of clinical encounters with patients with advanced squamous NSCLC did not meaningfully influence baseline knowledge or degree of improvement. Conclusions: This analysis demonstrates variable baseline preparedness and distinct, specialty-specific educational needs related to IO use in advanced squamous NSCLC. While education improved understanding of clinical evidence and disease-specific considerations, gaps in translating data into regimen selection persisted for some audiences, reinforcing the need for ongoing, targeted educational strategies. Importantly, improvements were not dependent on patient volume or experience, suggesting that structured education can benefit clinicians regardless of prior exposure to this patient population. Learning Objective Oncologists (N = 35) (% Pre Correct, % Post Correct; P Value) Pulmonologists (N = 20) (% Pre Correct, % Post Correct; P Value) Pathologists (N = 43) (% Pre Correct, % Post Correct; P Value) Describe the clinical considerations associated with advanced squamous NSCLC 93%, 96%; NS 78%, 90%; NS 63%, 79%; <.01 Differentiate between key findings of immunotherapy use in advanced squamous NSCLC 61%, 77%; <.001 50%, 80%; <.01 48%, 64%; <.01 Articulate the rationale for selecting specific immunotherapy regimens for advanced squamous NSCLC 31%, 54%; <.01 5%, 15%; NS 7%, 9%; NS

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.e21002
Primary Topic
Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The impact of online CME on addressing clinical decision-making for immunotherapy in advanced squamous NSCLC.

Andrew Small, Michelle Arielle Worst, Sandip Pravin Patel, Amy Furedy et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
article

The impact of online CME on addressing clinical decision-making for immunotherapy in advanced squamous NSCLC.

Andrew Small, Michelle Arielle Worst, Sandip Pravin Patel, Amy Furedy, Charu Aggarwal
article en

Abstract

e21002 Background: Immunotherapy (IO)-based regimens are foundational to the management of advanced squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Effective clinical application requires accurate interpretation of emerging trial data, integration of patient- and disease-specific considerations, and informed selection among available regimens. Given the multidisciplinary nature of NSCLC care, baseline understanding and practical readiness to apply immunotherapy data may vary across oncologists, pathologists, and pulmonologists. The objective of this study was to assess the educational impact of a single continuing medical education (CME) activity on clinicians’ recognition of the role of IO in advanced squamous NSCLC and treatment decisions. Methods: The educational intervention presented included an online, CME-certified video discussion between two expert faculty. Educational impact was assessed with repeated paired pre-/post-assessment study design, where individual participants served as their own control. Outcomes were analyzed by learning objective and stratified by specialty (oncologists, pathologists, and pulmonologists). A McNemar’s test assessed significant levels of changes reported with P values <.05 considered statistically significant. The activity launched September 2025; data were collected until January 2026. Results: Across specialties, participation in CME was associated with improvements in post-education performance (Table). Exploratory analyses demonstrated that frequency of clinical encounters with patients with advanced squamous NSCLC did not meaningfully influence baseline knowledge or degree of improvement. Conclusions: This analysis demonstrates variable baseline preparedness and distinct, specialty-specific educational needs related to IO use in advanced squamous NSCLC. While education improved understanding of clinical evidence and disease-specific considerations, gaps in translating data into regimen selection persisted for some audiences, reinforcing the need for ongoing, targeted educational strategies. Importantly, improvements were not dependent on patient volume or experience, suggesting that structured education can benefit clinicians regardless of prior exposure to this patient population. Learning Objective Oncologists (N = 35) (% Pre Correct, % Post Correct; P Value) Pulmonologists (N = 20) (% Pre Correct, % Post Correct; P Value) Pathologists (N = 43) (% Pre Correct, % Post Correct; P Value) Describe the clinical considerations associated with advanced squamous NSCLC 93%, 96%; NS 78%, 90%; NS 63%, 79%; <.01 Differentiate between key findings of immunotherapy use in advanced squamous NSCLC 61%, 77%; <.001 50%, 80%; <.01 48%, 64%; <.01 Articulate the rationale for selecting specific immunotherapy regimens for advanced squamous NSCLC 31%, 54%; <.01 5%, 15%; NS 7%, 9%; NS

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
UC San Diego Health System (US), Penn Center for AIDS Research (US), University of Pennsylvania Health System (US), Medscape (US), Moores Cancer Center, Abramson Cancer Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.