An exploratory study of the potential clinical impact of ethnicity in patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma.

e23533 Background: Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for localized retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS), but emerging data and interest support multimodality therapy, especially in the neoadjuvant setting. We studied the association of ethnicity with RPS outcomes and potential biases in non-surgical therapy utilization at an academic sarcoma referral center in a major U.S. city. Methods: Data were reviewed for all RPS patients under the care of a single sarcoma-trained surgical oncologist between July 2022 and December 2025. Inclusion criteria were: non-metastatic, primary disease; the most common RPS histologic types (liposarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor, solitary fibrous tumor); and curative-intent, complete resection (R0/R1). For study patients, clinicopathologic data were summarized. Development of local recurrence (LR) or distant metastasis (DM) was used to determine disease-free interval (DFI). Results: Among 112 patients during the study period, 35 met inclusion criteria. By histologic type, 23 patients had liposarcoma (66%), 9 leiomyosarcoma (26%) and 3 other (8.6%). Study patients were categorized by ethnicity: Caucasian (Group A, n = 12, 34%), Hispanic (B, n = 13, 37%), Asian/Middle Eastern (C, n = 10, 29%). A balanced distribution of histologic types was seen within each ethnic group. In Group A, neoadjuvant therapy (systemic or radiation) was given in only 1 patient in Group A (8.3%) versus 4 in B (30%) and 2 in C (20%) (Fisher’s exact test p = 0.44). No patient received adjuvant therapy in Groups A or B, while this was given in 2 additional patients in C (40% total). Disease progression (defined as either LR or DM) occurred in 4 out of 9 patients in A (44%), 2 out of 11 in B (18%) and 4 out of 8 in C (50%). Average DFI was 6 months in A, 5 in B and 8 in C. Conclusions: With the limitation as a single center study, our cohort was representative of the histologic types seen in RPS and all patients underwent a uniform approach to management. Potential differences in outcome after surgery were observed that may segregate by ethnic group. Although based on a small sample size, a trend of higher utilization of neoadjuvant therapy and a lower frequency of disease progression after surgery was noted in Hispanic versus non-Hispanic patients. The current study highlights the need for further investigation into the impact of ethnicity in RPS management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.e23533
Primary Topic
Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An exploratory study of the potential clinical impact of ethnicity in patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma.

Lee Cranmer, William Tseng, Lisa Zhou
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

An exploratory study of the potential clinical impact of ethnicity in patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma.

Lee Cranmer, William Tseng, Lisa Zhou
article en

Abstract

e23533 Background: Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for localized retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS), but emerging data and interest support multimodality therapy, especially in the neoadjuvant setting. We studied the association of ethnicity with RPS outcomes and potential biases in non-surgical therapy utilization at an academic sarcoma referral center in a major U.S. city. Methods: Data were reviewed for all RPS patients under the care of a single sarcoma-trained surgical oncologist between July 2022 and December 2025. Inclusion criteria were: non-metastatic, primary disease; the most common RPS histologic types (liposarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor, solitary fibrous tumor); and curative-intent, complete resection (R0/R1). For study patients, clinicopathologic data were summarized. Development of local recurrence (LR) or distant metastasis (DM) was used to determine disease-free interval (DFI). Results: Among 112 patients during the study period, 35 met inclusion criteria. By histologic type, 23 patients had liposarcoma (66%), 9 leiomyosarcoma (26%) and 3 other (8.6%). Study patients were categorized by ethnicity: Caucasian (Group A, n = 12, 34%), Hispanic (B, n = 13, 37%), Asian/Middle Eastern (C, n = 10, 29%). A balanced distribution of histologic types was seen within each ethnic group. In Group A, neoadjuvant therapy (systemic or radiation) was given in only 1 patient in Group A (8.3%) versus 4 in B (30%) and 2 in C (20%) (Fisher’s exact test p = 0.44). No patient received adjuvant therapy in Groups A or B, while this was given in 2 additional patients in C (40% total). Disease progression (defined as either LR or DM) occurred in 4 out of 9 patients in A (44%), 2 out of 11 in B (18%) and 4 out of 8 in C (50%). Average DFI was 6 months in A, 5 in B and 8 in C. Conclusions: With the limitation as a single center study, our cohort was representative of the histologic types seen in RPS and all patients underwent a uniform approach to management. Potential differences in outcome after surgery were observed that may segregate by ethnic group. Although based on a small sample size, a trend of higher utilization of neoadjuvant therapy and a lower frequency of disease progression after surgery was noted in Hispanic versus non-Hispanic patients. The current study highlights the need for further investigation into the impact of ethnicity in RPS management.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
City Of Hope National Medical Center (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.