Discovering bioeconomy as an alternative paradigm towards the green transition

The successful adoption and implementation of a circular and sustainable bioeconomy model is a key ambition for many countries and international bodies worldwide, which are currently drafting and applying relevant strategies and policies. However, this transition from the current linear economic model to a more circular one requires major political reforms, strong commitment, and substantial innovation breakthroughs that foster technological progress. The present paper presents a four-level extensive literature review of the bioeconomy concept, covering 145 peer-reviewed studies identified through a structured search and screening process. The review spans publications from 2008 to 2024 and is complemented by an analysis of 56 non-academic policy documents drawn from 38 countries. To this end, the four levels of the analysis include: (a) a bibliometric analysis tracing the intellectual evolution of the bioeconomy concept, mapping citation networks and co-occurrence patterns; (b) a qualitative synthesis based on the three predominant bioeconomy visions, namely biotechnology, bioresources, and bioecology; (c) a review of the main national endeavours towards implementing bioeconomy strategies worldwide, based on a continental division scheme; (d) an examination of the prevailing limitations and shortcomings arising from bioeconomy implementation, including sustainability concerns, regulatory challenges, demand-side barriers, and monitoring deficiencies. The findings demonstrate the interdisciplinary nature of the field, the predominance of bioresource and biotechnology visions across national strategies, as well as the existence of approximately 40 dedicated national bioeconomy strategies worldwide. Furthermore, the analysis indicates the persistent lack of a universally accepted definition as the principal barrier to strategic coherence and effective monitoring. Based on these four levels of the review process, implications for future research are further revealed and highlighted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Sustainability
Published
2026-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-026-03498-x
Primary Topic
Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Discovering bioeconomy as an alternative paradigm towards the green transition

Georgios Maroulis, Panos Kalimeris, Panagiotis Koronaios
Discover Sustainability
Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
article

Discovering bioeconomy as an alternative paradigm towards the green transition

Georgios Maroulis, Panos Kalimeris, Panagiotis Koronaios
article en

Abstract

The successful adoption and implementation of a circular and sustainable bioeconomy model is a key ambition for many countries and international bodies worldwide, which are currently drafting and applying relevant strategies and policies. However, this transition from the current linear economic model to a more circular one requires major political reforms, strong commitment, and substantial innovation breakthroughs that foster technological progress. The present paper presents a four-level extensive literature review of the bioeconomy concept, covering 145 peer-reviewed studies identified through a structured search and screening process. The review spans publications from 2008 to 2024 and is complemented by an analysis of 56 non-academic policy documents drawn from 38 countries. To this end, the four levels of the analysis include: (a) a bibliometric analysis tracing the intellectual evolution of the bioeconomy concept, mapping citation networks and co-occurrence patterns; (b) a qualitative synthesis based on the three predominant bioeconomy visions, namely biotechnology, bioresources, and bioecology; (c) a review of the main national endeavours towards implementing bioeconomy strategies worldwide, based on a continental division scheme; (d) an examination of the prevailing limitations and shortcomings arising from bioeconomy implementation, including sustainability concerns, regulatory challenges, demand-side barriers, and monitoring deficiencies. The findings demonstrate the interdisciplinary nature of the field, the predominance of bioresource and biotechnology visions across national strategies, as well as the existence of approximately 40 dedicated national bioeconomy strategies worldwide. Furthermore, the analysis indicates the persistent lack of a universally accepted definition as the principal barrier to strategic coherence and effective monitoring. Based on these four levels of the review process, implications for future research are further revealed and highlighted.

Discover Sustainability
Panteion University (GR), National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.