How low-income gay and bisexual men who have sex with men navigate financial challenges to HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis use: a qualitative study

Gay and bisexual men who have sex with men (GBMSM) are disproportionately vulnerable to HIV. While prevention efforts emphasize the use of HIV PrEP, low uptake has been attributed to socioeconomic inequities. Even with the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force's designation of PrEP as a "Grade A" prevention service, high out-of-pocket costs for PrEP persist. Yet, limited research has examined how these expenses influence PrEP uptake and use among communities vulnerable to HIV. The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore the role of finances in PrEP use among GBMSM. From January-March 2021, we conducted in-depth interviews with 30 GBMSM about finances and PrEP. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and thematically analyzed to report semantic-level themes using a four-phase approach. Participants had varying PrEP experiences; 26.7% currently used PrEP, 33.3% previously used PrEP and 40.0% never used PrEP. Thematic analysis identified four themes. Among current and former PrEP users, two themes highlighted the importance of PrEP assistance programs and noted financial strategies to afford PrEP. Among PrEP-naïve participants, two themes emphasized financial and health insurance challenges and factors influencing PrEP accessibility. Findings provide valuable insight into how GBMSM experience and navigate financial-related barriers to PrEP care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AIDS Care
Published
2026-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2026.2649875
Primary Topic
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How low-income gay and bisexual men who have sex with men navigate financial challenges to HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis use: a qualitative study

Christian Grov, Drew A. Westmoreland, Nevin Cohen, Denis Nash et al.
AIDS Care
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
article

How low-income gay and bisexual men who have sex with men navigate financial challenges to HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis use: a qualitative study

Christian Grov, Drew A. Westmoreland, Nevin Cohen, Denis Nash, Paige E. Murrill, Jacob Bleasdale, Alexa D'Angelo
article en

Abstract

Gay and bisexual men who have sex with men (GBMSM) are disproportionately vulnerable to HIV. While prevention efforts emphasize the use of HIV PrEP, low uptake has been attributed to socioeconomic inequities. Even with the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force's designation of PrEP as a "Grade A" prevention service, high out-of-pocket costs for PrEP persist. Yet, limited research has examined how these expenses influence PrEP uptake and use among communities vulnerable to HIV. The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore the role of finances in PrEP use among GBMSM. From January-March 2021, we conducted in-depth interviews with 30 GBMSM about finances and PrEP. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and thematically analyzed to report semantic-level themes using a four-phase approach. Participants had varying PrEP experiences; 26.7% currently used PrEP, 33.3% previously used PrEP and 40.0% never used PrEP. Thematic analysis identified four themes. Among current and former PrEP users, two themes highlighted the importance of PrEP assistance programs and noted financial strategies to afford PrEP. Among PrEP-naïve participants, two themes emphasized financial and health insurance challenges and factors influencing PrEP accessibility. Findings provide valuable insight into how GBMSM experience and navigate financial-related barriers to PrEP care.

AIDS Care
University of Central Florida (US), City University of New York (US), University of Florida (US)
National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.