Patients’ needs, expectations & concerns regarding clear aligner treatment

OBJECTIVE: Patients aiming for clear aligner therapy (CAT) have a distinct expectation regarding their orthodontic treatment. The aim of this prospective cohort study was to increase our knowledge on these specific patients' needs, expectations, and concerns regarding CAT. METHODS: Patients, who were about to start CAT, were asked to answer both, a 32-item questionnaire addressing expectations regarding CAT, rated on a 10-point visual analogue scale, and the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) questionnaire. In addition, demographic and clinical data were collected. RESULTS: A total of 82 patients participated (mean age 35 ± 12 years; 74.4% female). Patients strongly expected CAT to treat their malocclusion as effectively as orthodontic brackets (9.5 ± 0.9 points) and they would seek a second opinion if they were told treatment with CAT would not be possible (7.2 ± 3.3 points). In addition, patients appeared not willing to compromise on the planned treatment outcome, even if it would decrease treatment time (2.1 ± 2.3 points) or costs (2.4 ± 2.5 points). Further, they highly expected that the treatment result would endure for their lifetime (8.8 ± 2.1 points), they wanted to avoid visibility of orthodontic brackets (7.9 ± 2.8 points), prevent potential future problems (9.1 ± 1.5 points), and see a simulation of the expected treatment outcome (7.5 ± 2.9 points). The most important limitations with CAT expected by the participants were pain during treatment (7.7 ± 2.7 points) and restricted eating and drinking habits (7.3 ± 2.8 points). CONCLUSION: Patients considering CAT exhibit high expectations, particularly regarding treatment outcomes, aesthetics, and efficiency and they appear not willing to accept any compromise due to choosing CAT. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Knowledge about these expectations can support our patient communication and thereby improve patients' satisfaction with the treatment outcome.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Oral Investigations
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-026-06903-x
Primary Topic
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patients’ needs, expectations & concerns regarding clear aligner treatment

Stefan Lettner, Kristina Bertl, Linda Schwarz, Erwin Jonke et al.
Clinical Oral Investigations
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
article

Patients’ needs, expectations & concerns regarding clear aligner treatment

Stefan Lettner, Kristina Bertl, Linda Schwarz, Erwin Jonke, Karin Schweiger, Leonie Schaller, Bärbl Reistenhofer, Michael Nemec
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Patients aiming for clear aligner therapy (CAT) have a distinct expectation regarding their orthodontic treatment. The aim of this prospective cohort study was to increase our knowledge on these specific patients' needs, expectations, and concerns regarding CAT. METHODS: Patients, who were about to start CAT, were asked to answer both, a 32-item questionnaire addressing expectations regarding CAT, rated on a 10-point visual analogue scale, and the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) questionnaire. In addition, demographic and clinical data were collected. RESULTS: A total of 82 patients participated (mean age 35 ± 12 years; 74.4% female). Patients strongly expected CAT to treat their malocclusion as effectively as orthodontic brackets (9.5 ± 0.9 points) and they would seek a second opinion if they were told treatment with CAT would not be possible (7.2 ± 3.3 points). In addition, patients appeared not willing to compromise on the planned treatment outcome, even if it would decrease treatment time (2.1 ± 2.3 points) or costs (2.4 ± 2.5 points). Further, they highly expected that the treatment result would endure for their lifetime (8.8 ± 2.1 points), they wanted to avoid visibility of orthodontic brackets (7.9 ± 2.8 points), prevent potential future problems (9.1 ± 1.5 points), and see a simulation of the expected treatment outcome (7.5 ± 2.9 points). The most important limitations with CAT expected by the participants were pain during treatment (7.7 ± 2.7 points) and restricted eating and drinking habits (7.3 ± 2.8 points). CONCLUSION: Patients considering CAT exhibit high expectations, particularly regarding treatment outcomes, aesthetics, and efficiency and they appear not willing to accept any compromise due to choosing CAT. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Knowledge about these expectations can support our patient communication and thereby improve patients' satisfaction with the treatment outcome.

Clinical Oral InvestigationsVol. 30(6)
Sigmund Freud Privatuniversität Wien (AT), Region Blekinge (SE), Roosevelt Hospital (GT), AustriaTech (Austria) (AT), Medical University of Vienna (AT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.