Spatial assessment of field-scale water use efficiency of an AI-radar guided irrigation system using UAV-derived and OpenET evapotranspiration

Declining groundwater levels in the Ogallala Aquifer have increased the urgent need to improve water productivity in irrigated cropping systems in the U.S. Great Plains. Precision irrigation strategies that account for sustainable water use may enhance field-scale water use efficiency (WUE f = Grain yield/actual evapotranspiration). This study evaluated a novel irrigation system (AI-Radar; Field A) against a sub-surface drip irrigation system (SDI; Field B) in an on-farm field trial (both fields located in proximity) by quantifying WUE f for soybean ( Glycine max L.) production. WUE f was calculated as a function of crop yield and seasonal evapotranspiration (seasonal ET a ). Seasonal ET a was quantified using UAV-based surface energy balance modelling (HRMET) and daily OpenET ensemble satellite estimates as complementary tools. This was used to calculate WUE f as crop yield divided by seasonal ET a . Results exhibited WUE f was significantly (p-value < 0.05) higher under Field A (UAV: 7.17 ± 2.41 kg ha⁻¹ mm⁻¹; OpenET: 6.66 ± 2.24 kg ha⁻¹ mm⁻¹) than Field B (UAV: 5.70 ± 2.13 kg ha⁻¹ mm⁻¹; OpenET: 5.06 ± 1.89 kg ha⁻¹ mm⁻¹), alongside an estimated 15 to 27% lower seasonal irrigation depth than the SDI (according to growers record). The mean yield under AI-Radar (3189 kg/ha) was 30.8% higher than SDI (2208 kg/ha) (p < 0.05), with a lower coefficient of variation (9.96%), indicating higher yield potential in Field A. Comparison of seasonal ET a estimates derived from UAV and OpenET showed moderate to strong agreement (R 2 = 0.65 to 0.69, RMSE = 0.77 to 0.90 mm day -1 ; NRMSE = 21.8 to 23.4%; MBE = -0.28 to -0.42 mm day -1 ). Both methods (UAV and OpenET) supported the findings of the irrigation performance evaluation. Specifically, OpenET, an open-source, easily accessible tool, offers growers a scalable way to monitor field-scale ETa. By comparing AI-driven radar-based irrigation with SDI system using UAV- and OpenET-derived ETa estimates, this study provides a practical framework for evaluating irrigation performance at the field scale.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Smart Agricultural Technology
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2026.102255
Primary Topic
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spatial assessment of field-scale water use efficiency of an AI-radar guided irrigation system using UAV-derived and OpenET evapotranspiration

Udit Debangshi, P. V. N. Prasad, Vaishali Sharda, Susan Metzger et al.
Smart Agricultural Technology
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
article

Spatial assessment of field-scale water use efficiency of an AI-radar guided irrigation system using UAV-derived and OpenET evapotranspiration

Udit Debangshi, P. V. N. Prasad, Vaishali Sharda, Susan Metzger, Gaurav Jha, Prasad Deshpande, Ignacio A. Ciampitti
article en

Abstract

Declining groundwater levels in the Ogallala Aquifer have increased the urgent need to improve water productivity in irrigated cropping systems in the U.S. Great Plains. Precision irrigation strategies that account for sustainable water use may enhance field-scale water use efficiency (WUE f = Grain yield/actual evapotranspiration). This study evaluated a novel irrigation system (AI-Radar; Field A) against a sub-surface drip irrigation system (SDI; Field B) in an on-farm field trial (both fields located in proximity) by quantifying WUE f for soybean ( Glycine max L.) production. WUE f was calculated as a function of crop yield and seasonal evapotranspiration (seasonal ET a ). Seasonal ET a was quantified using UAV-based surface energy balance modelling (HRMET) and daily OpenET ensemble satellite estimates as complementary tools. This was used to calculate WUE f as crop yield divided by seasonal ET a . Results exhibited WUE f was significantly (p-value < 0.05) higher under Field A (UAV: 7.17 ± 2.41 kg ha⁻¹ mm⁻¹; OpenET: 6.66 ± 2.24 kg ha⁻¹ mm⁻¹) than Field B (UAV: 5.70 ± 2.13 kg ha⁻¹ mm⁻¹; OpenET: 5.06 ± 1.89 kg ha⁻¹ mm⁻¹), alongside an estimated 15 to 27% lower seasonal irrigation depth than the SDI (according to growers record). The mean yield under AI-Radar (3189 kg/ha) was 30.8% higher than SDI (2208 kg/ha) (p < 0.05), with a lower coefficient of variation (9.96%), indicating higher yield potential in Field A. Comparison of seasonal ET a estimates derived from UAV and OpenET showed moderate to strong agreement (R 2 = 0.65 to 0.69, RMSE = 0.77 to 0.90 mm day -1 ; NRMSE = 21.8 to 23.4%; MBE = -0.28 to -0.42 mm day -1 ). Both methods (UAV and OpenET) supported the findings of the irrigation performance evaluation. Specifically, OpenET, an open-source, easily accessible tool, offers growers a scalable way to monitor field-scale ETa. By comparing AI-driven radar-based irrigation with SDI system using UAV- and OpenET-derived ETa estimates, this study provides a practical framework for evaluating irrigation performance at the field scale.

Smart Agricultural TechnologyVol. 14
Kansas State University (US), Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Kansas State University, National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Kansas Department of Agriculture
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.