Community-engaged participatory methods for embedding equity in trial design

BACKGROUND: Certain populations are consistently under-represented in randomised controlled trials (RCTs), including people from minority ethnic backgrounds and those experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage, language barriers, or marginalisation within health systems. This under-representation contributes to widening health inequities. While UK guidance such as the National Institute for Health and Care Research INCLUDE resources supports more inclusive research, practical methodologies for embedding equity in trial design remain limited. This paper draws on two linked public involvement projects: Talking Trials (2021-2023), working with ethnically diverse urban communities in Cardiff, and Let's Talk Research (2025), working with residents in a socioeconomically disadvantaged rural Welsh community. METHODS: Both projects used participatory methods including arts-based activities, deliberative dialogue, and co-production. Talking Trials incorporated thematic analysis of workshop reflections; both projects generated learning through reflective discussions with community partners. RESULTS: Community-based public contributors identified features that made research feel relevant and equitable: trusted relationships, time for dialogue, and support to understand complex concepts. Creative and dialogue-based approaches made research concepts accessible, reduced power imbalances, and supported contributors to move from unfamiliarity to active involvement. Sustained structures, such as advisory groups and community connectors, were important for maintaining trust and enabling continued engagement. Context strongly shaped involvement, with different forms of disadvantage requiring different types of support. CONCLUSIONS: Community-engaged, arts-based, and context-sensitive methods can meaningfully enhance equity in trial design. Embedding involvement early, investing in trusted partnerships, and sustaining long-term structures support more relevant, acceptable, and inclusive trials. These findings offer practical methodologies for trial teams seeking to embed equity from the outset.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Trials
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-026-09820-2
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Community-engaged participatory methods for embedding equity in trial design

Rena Zhang, Kense Hayan, Sarah Bridges, Jeremy Segrott et al.
Trials
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
article

Community-engaged participatory methods for embedding equity in trial design

Rena Zhang, Kense Hayan, Sarah Bridges, Jeremy Segrott, Martina Svobodová, Mashmooma Din, Nina Jacob, Sudipta Bandyopadhyay, Allan Herbert, Harley Bryan, Islah Hamad, Becca Thomas, Catherine Lamont Robinson, Aysha H. Ilias
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Certain populations are consistently under-represented in randomised controlled trials (RCTs), including people from minority ethnic backgrounds and those experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage, language barriers, or marginalisation within health systems. This under-representation contributes to widening health inequities. While UK guidance such as the National Institute for Health and Care Research INCLUDE resources supports more inclusive research, practical methodologies for embedding equity in trial design remain limited. This paper draws on two linked public involvement projects: Talking Trials (2021-2023), working with ethnically diverse urban communities in Cardiff, and Let's Talk Research (2025), working with residents in a socioeconomically disadvantaged rural Welsh community. METHODS: Both projects used participatory methods including arts-based activities, deliberative dialogue, and co-production. Talking Trials incorporated thematic analysis of workshop reflections; both projects generated learning through reflective discussions with community partners. RESULTS: Community-based public contributors identified features that made research feel relevant and equitable: trusted relationships, time for dialogue, and support to understand complex concepts. Creative and dialogue-based approaches made research concepts accessible, reduced power imbalances, and supported contributors to move from unfamiliarity to active involvement. Sustained structures, such as advisory groups and community connectors, were important for maintaining trust and enabling continued engagement. Context strongly shaped involvement, with different forms of disadvantage requiring different types of support. CONCLUSIONS: Community-engaged, arts-based, and context-sensitive methods can meaningfully enhance equity in trial design. Embedding involvement early, investing in trusted partnerships, and sustaining long-term structures support more relevant, acceptable, and inclusive trials. These findings offer practical methodologies for trial teams seeking to embed equity from the outset.

Trials
University of Bristol (GB), Riverside (GB), Cardiff University (GB), Cardiff Metropolitan University (GB)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.