Evaluation of plasma calprotectin as a marker for infection in various clinical settings: a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND: Reliably distinguishing infection from sterile inflammation is a major clinical challenge. Uncertainty can lead to unnecessary courses of antibiotics, fueling antimicrobial resistance and adverse effects. Calprotectin, a biomarker released by activated immune cells, may inform decision-making. METHODS: This prospective, observational, single-centre study recruited patients with suspected infection who provided blood samples on enrolment from the Emergency Department (ED) and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of a central London university hospital. A separate longitudinal study with five days' blood sampling was performed in patients undergoing elective major non-cardiac surgery, in whom infection was adjudicated according to the Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine (StEP) initiative. Diagnostic adjudication was performed blinded to calprotectin. The primary outcome was the ability of calprotectin to diagnose infection. Secondary outcomes included a comparison to C-reactive protein (CRP). RESULTS: 427 patients were included, of whom 186 (44%) were female. Of 245 ED patients, 71 (29%) had active cancer and 56 (23%) were on immunosuppressants. The median calprotectin level in the no-infection group was 1.97 mg/L (IQR 1.02-3.39), compared to 2.76 (IQR 1.65-5.08) mg/L in low-probability infection, 2.63 mg/L (IQR 1.83-5.23) in high-probability infection, and 2.64 mg/L (IQR 1.49-4.45) in patients with confirmed infection. Ordinal regression analysis found no meaningful association between calprotectin levels and infection, or bacterial infection. Logistic regression showed an unadjusted AUC of 0.53 (95%-CI 0.45-0.62) for calprotectin and a binary outcome of infection compared to an AUC of 0.63 (95%-CI 0.55-0.71) for CRP. Similar results were seen in a sensitivity analysis excluding patients with cancer or immunosuppression. In 98 ICU patients, neither calprotectin nor CRP showed a meaningful association with an adjudicated diagnosis of infection or ICU death. In the peri-operative cohort, calprotectin levels remained elevated over 5 days, but with no difference between patients developing or not developing infection. CONCLUSION: Calprotectin showed only limited ability to differentiate infection from inflammation across ED, ICU, and elective surgery patients. Excluding patients with cancer or immunosuppression did not alter the overall findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-026-00923-3
Primary Topic
S100 Proteins and Annexins
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of plasma calprotectin as a marker for infection in various clinical settings: a prospective observational study

Timothy Arthur Chandos Snow, Nishkantha Arulkumaran, Martin Siegemund, Pedro Lopez-Ayala et al.
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
S100 Proteins and Annexins
article

Evaluation of plasma calprotectin as a marker for infection in various clinical settings: a prospective observational study

Timothy Arthur Chandos Snow, Nishkantha Arulkumaran, Martin Siegemund, Pedro Lopez-Ayala, Mervyn Singer, David Brealey, Ahmed Al-Hindawi, Tobias Zimmermann, Samer Elkhodair
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reliably distinguishing infection from sterile inflammation is a major clinical challenge. Uncertainty can lead to unnecessary courses of antibiotics, fueling antimicrobial resistance and adverse effects. Calprotectin, a biomarker released by activated immune cells, may inform decision-making. METHODS: This prospective, observational, single-centre study recruited patients with suspected infection who provided blood samples on enrolment from the Emergency Department (ED) and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of a central London university hospital. A separate longitudinal study with five days' blood sampling was performed in patients undergoing elective major non-cardiac surgery, in whom infection was adjudicated according to the Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine (StEP) initiative. Diagnostic adjudication was performed blinded to calprotectin. The primary outcome was the ability of calprotectin to diagnose infection. Secondary outcomes included a comparison to C-reactive protein (CRP). RESULTS: 427 patients were included, of whom 186 (44%) were female. Of 245 ED patients, 71 (29%) had active cancer and 56 (23%) were on immunosuppressants. The median calprotectin level in the no-infection group was 1.97 mg/L (IQR 1.02-3.39), compared to 2.76 (IQR 1.65-5.08) mg/L in low-probability infection, 2.63 mg/L (IQR 1.83-5.23) in high-probability infection, and 2.64 mg/L (IQR 1.49-4.45) in patients with confirmed infection. Ordinal regression analysis found no meaningful association between calprotectin levels and infection, or bacterial infection. Logistic regression showed an unadjusted AUC of 0.53 (95%-CI 0.45-0.62) for calprotectin and a binary outcome of infection compared to an AUC of 0.63 (95%-CI 0.55-0.71) for CRP. Similar results were seen in a sensitivity analysis excluding patients with cancer or immunosuppression. In 98 ICU patients, neither calprotectin nor CRP showed a meaningful association with an adjudicated diagnosis of infection or ICU death. In the peri-operative cohort, calprotectin levels remained elevated over 5 days, but with no difference between patients developing or not developing infection. CONCLUSION: Calprotectin showed only limited ability to differentiate infection from inflammation across ED, ICU, and elective surgery patients. Excluding patients with cancer or immunosuppression did not alter the overall findings.

Intensive Care Medicine ExperimentalVol. 14(1)
University College Hospital (GB), University of Basel (CH), University Hospital of Basel (CH), University College London (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
S100 Proteins and Annexins
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.