Comparative experimental evaluation of a proposed creep failure model for stainless steel 304

The limitations of the existing creep failure models have led to the development of a new approach for creep life prediction. Traditional models such as Norton–Bailey and Omega often fall short in accurately capturing the tertiary phase of creep in engineering materials. Similarly, models like Kachanov–Rabotnov, Theta Projection, and the Sine Hyperbolic methods require detailed material-specific parameters to effectively predict damage. To overcome these challenges, a novel hybrid creep model has been proposed by integrating the Norton–Bailey and Kachanov–Rabotnov formulations. This combined framework harnesses the strengths of both models while compensating for their individual shortcomings. The model was incorporated into the finite element (FE) software ABAQUS through curve fitting—utilizing regression analysis to transition from the baseline Omega model to the Norton–Bailey model. Validation was carried out through a series of experimental tests, including ambient and high-temperature tensile tests, as well as creep tests on stainless steel 304. The results were then compared with finite element creep simulations using dog bone specimens. The new model demonstrated excellent predictive accuracy, outperforming traditional models like Omega and Norton–Bailey, achieving up to 91.79% accuracy in creep strain and creep strain rate over a 1000-hour test and 93.92% accuracy for 336 h test.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Progress in Engineering Science
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pes.2026.100310
Primary Topic
High Temperature Alloys and Creep
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative experimental evaluation of a proposed creep failure model for stainless steel 304

Maaz Akhtar, Asad Ali Zaidi, Muhammad Kashif Khan, Muhammad Muzamil et al.
Progress in Engineering Science
High Temperature Alloys and Creep
article

Comparative experimental evaluation of a proposed creep failure model for stainless steel 304

Maaz Akhtar, Asad Ali Zaidi, Muhammad Kashif Khan, Muhammad Muzamil, Mohsin Sattar, Jan Hosek
article en

Abstract

The limitations of the existing creep failure models have led to the development of a new approach for creep life prediction. Traditional models such as Norton–Bailey and Omega often fall short in accurately capturing the tertiary phase of creep in engineering materials. Similarly, models like Kachanov–Rabotnov, Theta Projection, and the Sine Hyperbolic methods require detailed material-specific parameters to effectively predict damage. To overcome these challenges, a novel hybrid creep model has been proposed by integrating the Norton–Bailey and Kachanov–Rabotnov formulations. This combined framework harnesses the strengths of both models while compensating for their individual shortcomings. The model was incorporated into the finite element (FE) software ABAQUS through curve fitting—utilizing regression analysis to transition from the baseline Omega model to the Norton–Bailey model. Validation was carried out through a series of experimental tests, including ambient and high-temperature tensile tests, as well as creep tests on stainless steel 304. The results were then compared with finite element creep simulations using dog bone specimens. The new model demonstrated excellent predictive accuracy, outperforming traditional models like Omega and Norton–Bailey, achieving up to 91.79% accuracy in creep strain and creep strain rate over a 1000-hour test and 93.92% accuracy for 336 h test.

Progress in Engineering ScienceVol. 3(2)
NED University of Engineering and Technology (PK), University of Derby (GB), Imam Mohammad ibn Saud Islamic University (SA), Islamic University of Madinah (SA), Czech Technical University in Prague (CZ)
Deanship of Scientific Research, Imam Mohammed Ibn Saud Islamic University
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
High Temperature Alloys and Creep
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.