Risk of Ocular Hypertension With Intravitreal Triamcinolone Compared to the Dexamethasone Implant

Purpose: To determine whether there is a difference in the risk of ocular hypertension between patients in a large United States healthcare database who received an intravitreal dexamethasone implant and those who received intravitreal (IVT) triamcinolone acetonide injections. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted from 2011 to 2022. Cohorts were created by identifying patients who were treated for the first time with either dexamethasone implants or IVT triamcinolone. The primary outcome was the number of patients requiring treatment for ocular hypertension. Cox proportional hazards regression modeling was performed for risk analyses, and inverse proportional treatment weighting was included. A sensitivity analysis used a new diagnosis of glaucoma or suspected glaucoma as the outcome. Results: In total, 147 (8.8%) of 1665 patients treated with dexamethasone implants and 282 (7.3%) of 3866 patients treated with IVT triamcinolone received medical or surgical therapy for ocular hypertension. In hazards models with inverse proportional treatment weighting of propensity scores, cohorts were found to be balanced in all covariates (standardized mean difference <0.1 for each variable). Cox proportional hazards regression analysis showed no difference in risk of requiring ocular hypertension treatment in the group treated with dexamethasone implants compared with the IVT triamcinolone group in the postinjection period of 1 to 40 days (hazard ratio [HR], 0.77, 95% CI, 0.53–1.12; P = .17). However, analysis after 40 days showed that treatment with dexamethasone implants, as compared with IVT triamcinolone, conferred an increased risk of requiring ocular hypertension treatment (HR, 1.41, 95% CI, 1.08–1.86; P = .01). Sensitivity analyses showed a similar, but nonsignificant risk of progressing to a diagnosis of glaucoma or suspected glaucoma in the dexamethasone implant group compared with the IVT triamcinolone group at 40 days after injection (HR, 1.24, 95% CI, 0.91–1.70; P = .18). Conclusions: Treatment with dexamethasone implants was associated with an increased risk of requiring ocular hypertension treatment when compared with IVT triamcinolone treatment. Clinicians should be aware of this increased risk when counseling patients regarding their treatment options.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/24741264261447503
Primary Topic
Glaucoma and retinal disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risk of Ocular Hypertension With Intravitreal Triamcinolone Compared to the Dexamethasone Implant

Yineng Chen, Brian L. VanderBeek, Apoorv P. Chebolu, Fangming Jin
Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases
Glaucoma and retinal disorders
article

Risk of Ocular Hypertension With Intravitreal Triamcinolone Compared to the Dexamethasone Implant

Yineng Chen, Brian L. VanderBeek, Apoorv P. Chebolu, Fangming Jin
article en

Abstract

Purpose: To determine whether there is a difference in the risk of ocular hypertension between patients in a large United States healthcare database who received an intravitreal dexamethasone implant and those who received intravitreal (IVT) triamcinolone acetonide injections. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted from 2011 to 2022. Cohorts were created by identifying patients who were treated for the first time with either dexamethasone implants or IVT triamcinolone. The primary outcome was the number of patients requiring treatment for ocular hypertension. Cox proportional hazards regression modeling was performed for risk analyses, and inverse proportional treatment weighting was included. A sensitivity analysis used a new diagnosis of glaucoma or suspected glaucoma as the outcome. Results: In total, 147 (8.8%) of 1665 patients treated with dexamethasone implants and 282 (7.3%) of 3866 patients treated with IVT triamcinolone received medical or surgical therapy for ocular hypertension. In hazards models with inverse proportional treatment weighting of propensity scores, cohorts were found to be balanced in all covariates (standardized mean difference <0.1 for each variable). Cox proportional hazards regression analysis showed no difference in risk of requiring ocular hypertension treatment in the group treated with dexamethasone implants compared with the IVT triamcinolone group in the postinjection period of 1 to 40 days (hazard ratio [HR], 0.77, 95% CI, 0.53–1.12; P = .17). However, analysis after 40 days showed that treatment with dexamethasone implants, as compared with IVT triamcinolone, conferred an increased risk of requiring ocular hypertension treatment (HR, 1.41, 95% CI, 1.08–1.86; P = .01). Sensitivity analyses showed a similar, but nonsignificant risk of progressing to a diagnosis of glaucoma or suspected glaucoma in the dexamethasone implant group compared with the IVT triamcinolone group at 40 days after injection (HR, 1.24, 95% CI, 0.91–1.70; P = .18). Conclusions: Treatment with dexamethasone implants was associated with an increased risk of requiring ocular hypertension treatment when compared with IVT triamcinolone treatment. Clinicians should be aware of this increased risk when counseling patients regarding their treatment options.

Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases
Penn Presbyterian Medical Center (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Research to Prevent Blindness, National Eye Institute
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Glaucoma and retinal disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.