Ethical decision-making of military nurses during war and humanitarian crises

BackgroundThe unfamiliar situations and complex environments encountered in evolving combat and humanitarian operations, combined with advances in practice, means that deployed military nurses are increasingly likely to become more involved in, or lead, ethical decision-making in military treatment facilities.AimHow do United Kingdom military nurses experience ethical decision-making on combat and humanitarian deployments? Question: What are the experiences of military nurses regarding ethical decision-making during war or humanitarian crisis?DesignA qualitative, interpretive, 'Big Q' design analysed through reflexive thematic analysis was used.ParticipantsThirty United Kingdom military nurses with operational experience in combat or humanitarian missions, serving or retired, were purposively recruited.EthicsEthical approval was obtained from both the Ministry of Defence Research Ethics Committee (1009/MODREC/19) and the University of Birmingham Research Ethics Committee (ERN_17-1414). All participants gave informed consent and interviews were anonymised.ResultsTwo themes were developed: 'Doing the Right Thing', with one sub theme 'Professional Codes and Guidelines as Ethical Handrails', and 'The Deployed Context'.ConclusionThe findings show how military nurses try and do the ethically right thing, but situational constraints are, perhaps, significantly different to non-military nursing making ethical decision-making especially complex. Relatedly, military nurses' attempts to manage the prioritisation of their sometimes-conflicting identities of being both a healthcare professional and military professional compound this complexity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nursing Ethics
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330261449294
Primary Topic
Torture, Ethics, and Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ethical decision-making of military nurses during war and humanitarian crises

Mervyn Conroy, Roger Newham, Alan Brockie
Nursing Ethics
Torture, Ethics, and Law
article

Ethical decision-making of military nurses during war and humanitarian crises

Mervyn Conroy, Roger Newham, Alan Brockie
article en

Abstract

BackgroundThe unfamiliar situations and complex environments encountered in evolving combat and humanitarian operations, combined with advances in practice, means that deployed military nurses are increasingly likely to become more involved in, or lead, ethical decision-making in military treatment facilities.AimHow do United Kingdom military nurses experience ethical decision-making on combat and humanitarian deployments? Question: What are the experiences of military nurses regarding ethical decision-making during war or humanitarian crisis?DesignA qualitative, interpretive, 'Big Q' design analysed through reflexive thematic analysis was used.ParticipantsThirty United Kingdom military nurses with operational experience in combat or humanitarian missions, serving or retired, were purposively recruited.EthicsEthical approval was obtained from both the Ministry of Defence Research Ethics Committee (1009/MODREC/19) and the University of Birmingham Research Ethics Committee (ERN_17-1414). All participants gave informed consent and interviews were anonymised.ResultsTwo themes were developed: 'Doing the Right Thing', with one sub theme 'Professional Codes and Guidelines as Ethical Handrails', and 'The Deployed Context'.ConclusionThe findings show how military nurses try and do the ethically right thing, but situational constraints are, perhaps, significantly different to non-military nursing making ethical decision-making especially complex. Relatedly, military nurses' attempts to manage the prioritisation of their sometimes-conflicting identities of being both a healthcare professional and military professional compound this complexity.

Nursing Ethics
University of Lancashire (GB), Birmingham Research Park (GB), University of Birmingham (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Torture, Ethics, and Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.