Visual moralization of conflict on TikTok: A typology of journalistic framing

This study introduces Visual Conflict Moralization (VCM), a typology explaining how news organizations embed moral cues in the visual and narrative architecture of conflict reporting to shape audience perceptions on digital platforms. Drawing on Moral Foundations Theory (MFT), framing theory, and platform affordances, the authors analyze 736 video journalism artifacts from six global outlets covering the Israel–Gaza war (October 2023–April 2025). Care/Harm and Sanctity/Degradation were most prevalent, while Fairness/Cheating and Loyalty/Betrayal, though rarer, drove higher engagement. Narration and visual richness enhanced engagement; text-heavy formats mitigated it. They also propose two new moral dimensions, extending MFT for conflict contexts. By centering coverage of the Israel–Gaza war, their analysis foregrounds disparities in visual representation, especially of human experiences. This article offers a replicable model for multimodal analysis in digital journalism, and provides theoretical and practical guidance for ethical, engagement-driven visual communication across platforms, with implications for both scholarly critique and newsroom practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Media War & Conflict
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17506352261446076
Primary Topic
Media Studies and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Visual moralization of conflict on TikTok: A typology of journalistic framing

Shahira Fahmy, Laila Abbas, Aliaa K. ElShabassy
Media War & Conflict
Media Studies and Communication
article

Visual moralization of conflict on TikTok: A typology of journalistic framing

Shahira Fahmy, Laila Abbas, Aliaa K. ElShabassy
article en

Abstract

This study introduces Visual Conflict Moralization (VCM), a typology explaining how news organizations embed moral cues in the visual and narrative architecture of conflict reporting to shape audience perceptions on digital platforms. Drawing on Moral Foundations Theory (MFT), framing theory, and platform affordances, the authors analyze 736 video journalism artifacts from six global outlets covering the Israel–Gaza war (October 2023–April 2025). Care/Harm and Sanctity/Degradation were most prevalent, while Fairness/Cheating and Loyalty/Betrayal, though rarer, drove higher engagement. Narration and visual richness enhanced engagement; text-heavy formats mitigated it. They also propose two new moral dimensions, extending MFT for conflict contexts. By centering coverage of the Israel–Gaza war, their analysis foregrounds disparities in visual representation, especially of human experiences. This article offers a replicable model for multimodal analysis in digital journalism, and provides theoretical and practical guidance for ethical, engagement-driven visual communication across platforms, with implications for both scholarly critique and newsroom practice.

Media War & Conflict
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Cairo University (EG), American University in Cairo (EG)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Media Studies and Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.