Intradermal and Subcutaneous Botulinum Toxin Type A Injections Do Not Differ in the Induction of Neutralizing Antibody Formation

The neurotoxin botulinum toxin type A (BoNT/A), produced by the bacteria Clostridium botulinum, is commonly injected intramuscularly (IM) for the management of chronic muscle hyperactivity, such as post-stroke spasticity. New indications such as peripheral neuropathic pain require alternative routes of BoNT/A administration, such as subcutaneous (SC) or intradermal (ID). While IM BoNT/A injections may elicit anti-drug-antibodies (ADAs), their occurrence following SC or ID administration is unknown. Therefore, we investigated whether repeated SC or ID injections of 150 kDa BoNT/A can elicit ADAs in a dose-dependent manner, and whether these differ depending upon the route of administration. Mice were injected 5 times ID or SC with 150 kDa BoNT/A or, for higher doses, inactive mutant BoNT/A (DRBoNT/A) or inactivated toxoid (IA-BoNT/A). Total ADAs were analyzed by an immunoassay and the subgroup of neutralizing ADAs by an in vivo digit abduction score (DAS) assay following a challenge of 0.6 U BoNT/A IM. DRBoNT/A and IA-BoNT/A injections elicit ADAs (22.7 U/mL vs. 460.5 U/mL for ID; 4.7 U/mL vs. 339.4 U/mL for SC), while therapeutic doses of 150 kDa BoNT/A do not. Whereas mice with repeated 150 kDa BoNT/A injections at therapeutic dose show an unrestricted DAS of 3.7 (ID) or 3.4 (SC), mice injected repeatedly with 1.8 µg/kg DRBoNT/A or 500 µg/kg IA-BoNT/A show only a minimal DAS of ≤0.7, indicating a high titer of neutralizing ADAs. No differences were observed between administration routes. Accordingly, repeated ID or SC injections of pure 150 kDa BoNT/A at therapeutic doses fail to induce ADA formation in mice. On the other hand, DRBoNT/A ID injections induce higher ADA concentrations than SC, but generate similar amounts of neutralizing ADAs. IA-BoNT/A injections induce ADAs and neutralizing ADAs similarly after ID and SC injections. ADA development at intermediate BoNT/A doses can be higher after ID injection, but does not lead to differences in neutralizing ADAs. Our data demonstrate that the antibody response to botulinum toxin depends predominantly on the protein load, and less on the administration route.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Toxins
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins18060245
Primary Topic
Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intradermal and Subcutaneous Botulinum Toxin Type A Injections Do Not Differ in the Induction of Neutralizing Antibody Formation

Stefanie Honndorf, Klaus Fink, Jessica Moser
Toxins
Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
article

Intradermal and Subcutaneous Botulinum Toxin Type A Injections Do Not Differ in the Induction of Neutralizing Antibody Formation

Stefanie Honndorf, Klaus Fink, Jessica Moser
article en

Abstract

The neurotoxin botulinum toxin type A (BoNT/A), produced by the bacteria Clostridium botulinum, is commonly injected intramuscularly (IM) for the management of chronic muscle hyperactivity, such as post-stroke spasticity. New indications such as peripheral neuropathic pain require alternative routes of BoNT/A administration, such as subcutaneous (SC) or intradermal (ID). While IM BoNT/A injections may elicit anti-drug-antibodies (ADAs), their occurrence following SC or ID administration is unknown. Therefore, we investigated whether repeated SC or ID injections of 150 kDa BoNT/A can elicit ADAs in a dose-dependent manner, and whether these differ depending upon the route of administration. Mice were injected 5 times ID or SC with 150 kDa BoNT/A or, for higher doses, inactive mutant BoNT/A (DRBoNT/A) or inactivated toxoid (IA-BoNT/A). Total ADAs were analyzed by an immunoassay and the subgroup of neutralizing ADAs by an in vivo digit abduction score (DAS) assay following a challenge of 0.6 U BoNT/A IM. DRBoNT/A and IA-BoNT/A injections elicit ADAs (22.7 U/mL vs. 460.5 U/mL for ID; 4.7 U/mL vs. 339.4 U/mL for SC), while therapeutic doses of 150 kDa BoNT/A do not. Whereas mice with repeated 150 kDa BoNT/A injections at therapeutic dose show an unrestricted DAS of 3.7 (ID) or 3.4 (SC), mice injected repeatedly with 1.8 µg/kg DRBoNT/A or 500 µg/kg IA-BoNT/A show only a minimal DAS of ≤0.7, indicating a high titer of neutralizing ADAs. No differences were observed between administration routes. Accordingly, repeated ID or SC injections of pure 150 kDa BoNT/A at therapeutic doses fail to induce ADA formation in mice. On the other hand, DRBoNT/A ID injections induce higher ADA concentrations than SC, but generate similar amounts of neutralizing ADAs. IA-BoNT/A injections induce ADAs and neutralizing ADAs similarly after ID and SC injections. ADA development at intermediate BoNT/A doses can be higher after ID injection, but does not lead to differences in neutralizing ADAs. Our data demonstrate that the antibody response to botulinum toxin depends predominantly on the protein load, and less on the administration route.

ToxinsVol. 18(6)
Io Therapeutics (United States) (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Intradermal and Subcutaneous Botulinum Toxin Type A Injections Do Not Differ in the Induction of Neutralizing Antibody Formation — Stefanie Honndorf, Klaus Fink, et al. · Toxins (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS