Strain-specific differences in the response to egg-derived versus recombinant protein influenza vaccines
The 2023/2024 influenza vaccine included an updated H1N1 component designed to better match a new clade of H1N1 that had multiple mutations in antigenic epitopes of hemagglutinin. Despite this update, the vaccine trended toward being less effective against the vaccine-matched H1N1 clade than the parental H1N1 clade lacking the new antigenic mutations. Here, we measure neutralization titers of serum antibodies from individuals who had received either a recombinant protein or an egg-derived vaccine against a set of viruses with hemagglutinins from 58 H1N1 strains representative of the diversity during the 2023/2024 season. We find that egg-derived vaccine recipients, but not recombinant protein vaccine recipients, had a relatively lower boost in neutralizing titers to the new clade that the updated vaccine was designed to target. We suggest that the difference in the extent that the egg-derived vs recombinant protein vaccines boosted neutralizing titers to the new H1N1 clade is because the seed strain for the egg-derived vaccine strain had acquired a reversion of a key antigenic mutation (K142R) present in that clade. Our results show how egg-derived vs recombinant protein vaccines can elicit different relative titer boosts against different subsets of viral strains, a phenomenon that could impact vaccine effectiveness. IMPORTANCE: Influenza vaccines can be produced from virus grown in eggs or grown in cells or made with recombinant protein. Egg-derived influenza vaccines often contain egg-adaptive mutations in the viral antigen hemagglutinin (HA) which can impact the antigenicity or immunogenicity of the HA. In this study, we compare neutralization titers from egg-derived and recombinant protein vaccine recipients against recently circulating influenza A(H1N1) strains. We find that the egg-derived vaccine induces less of a boost in titers than the recombinant protein vaccine to the new clade of viral strains that the vaccine was designed to target.
Authors
- S. Cobey
- Elizabeth M. Drapeau (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8243-6478)
- Andrea N. Loes (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8659-0149)
- Sook‐San Wong (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1290-191X)
- Rosario Araceli L Tarabi
- SW Cheng
- Reilly K. Atkinson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9519-5700)
- Tachianna Griffiths
- Scott E. Hensley (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2928-7506)
- Shuk Hang Li
- John Huddleston
- Caroline Kikawa (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8654-5663)
- Nancy H. L. Leung
- Jesse D. Bloom (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1267-3408)
- Trevor Bedford
- Benjamin J. Cowling (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6297-7154)
Institutions
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
- University of Washington (US)
- University of Chicago (US)
- Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- University of Hong Kong (HK)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Virology
- Published
- 2026-05-27
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.00317-26
- Primary Topic
- Influenza Virus Research Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
- University of Washington
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases