Unraveling Social Comparison in Mental Health: A Process-Based Model and a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Current Evidence

Social comparison can fundamentally shape health perceptions. Building on existing literature, we first introduce a process model of health-related social comparison that consists of (a) seeking or encountering self-relevant social information, (b) evaluating self-attributes relative to social standards and generating a posterior target construal, (c) valuation of the comparison outcome based on personal motives and coping, and (d) affective, cognitive, and behavior responses. Second, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize existing knowledge about social comparison in populations with mental disorders. We systematically searched Medline, PsycInfo, and Web of Science. The included 72 studies suggest a strong correlation between social comparison and mental health. However, there is lack of research addressing the appraisal of the comparison outcomes and the reciprocal, longitudinal relationship between social comparison and health. Last, based on our model and meta-analytical results, we offer recommendations to inform future investigations of social comparison in mental health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Psychological Science
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026261442164
Primary Topic
Behavioral Health and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unraveling Social Comparison in Mental Health: A Process-Based Model and a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Current Evidence

Pascal Schlechter, Nexhmedin Morina, Thole H. Hoppen, Frederike K. Lemmel
Clinical Psychological Science
Behavioral Health and Interventions
article

Unraveling Social Comparison in Mental Health: A Process-Based Model and a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Current Evidence

Pascal Schlechter, Nexhmedin Morina, Thole H. Hoppen, Frederike K. Lemmel
article en

Abstract

Social comparison can fundamentally shape health perceptions. Building on existing literature, we first introduce a process model of health-related social comparison that consists of (a) seeking or encountering self-relevant social information, (b) evaluating self-attributes relative to social standards and generating a posterior target construal, (c) valuation of the comparison outcome based on personal motives and coping, and (d) affective, cognitive, and behavior responses. Second, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize existing knowledge about social comparison in populations with mental disorders. We systematically searched Medline, PsycInfo, and Web of Science. The included 72 studies suggest a strong correlation between social comparison and mental health. However, there is lack of research addressing the appraisal of the comparison outcomes and the reciprocal, longitudinal relationship between social comparison and health. Last, based on our model and meta-analytical results, we offer recommendations to inform future investigations of social comparison in mental health.

Clinical Psychological Science
The New School (US), University of Münster (DE), Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Psychology (CZ)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Behavioral Health and Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.