Reimagining Orthopaedic Research: The Musculoskeletal Adaptive Platform Trial (MAPT) Design Rationale

Musculoskeletal disorders are common and can profoundly affect the survival, mobility, and independence of patients. The overall objective of the Musculoskeletal Adaptive Platform Trial (MAPT) is to incrementally compare the effectiveness of available interventions to improve outcomes for adult patients with health conditions affecting physical mobility. The MAPT framework is flexible, allowing the detection of varying levels of meaningful benefit or harm (or equivalence) on the basis of the burden of disease and the available treatments. Treatment comparisons will be evaluated as intervention domains on the platform in order to achieve the overarching objective. Specific objectives for each intervention domain will be included in intervention domain-specific protocol appendices. The primary outcome is a hierarchically assessed composite of death within 120 days, ambulation status at 120 days, and days alive and out of the hospital within 120 days of randomization. Secondary outcomes will include the components of the composite outcome and patient-reported outcomes. Participants will be contacted at 6 weeks, 4 months, 8 months, and 12 months after randomization to ascertain trial outcomes. The MAPT will enable researchers to efficiently evaluate multiple treatment options for patients with musculoskeletal impairments, which may improve patient care and outcomes globally. Clinical Relevance: The MAPT is clinically relevant because it provides a practical framework for rapidly identifying which treatments improve survival, mobility, and recovery in patients with musculoskeletal conditions. It can directly guide better treatment decisions regarding a leading cause of disability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.25.01436
Primary Topic
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reimagining Orthopaedic Research: The Musculoskeletal Adaptive Platform Trial (MAPT) Design Rationale

Joseph P. Patterson, Nathan N. O’Hara, Vitaly Druker, Jason T. Connor et al.
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
article

Reimagining Orthopaedic Research: The Musculoskeletal Adaptive Platform Trial (MAPT) Design Rationale

Joseph P. Patterson, Nathan N. O’Hara, Vitaly Druker, Jason T. Connor, Debra Marvel, Gerard P. Slobogean, Sheila A. Sprague
article en

Abstract

Musculoskeletal disorders are common and can profoundly affect the survival, mobility, and independence of patients. The overall objective of the Musculoskeletal Adaptive Platform Trial (MAPT) is to incrementally compare the effectiveness of available interventions to improve outcomes for adult patients with health conditions affecting physical mobility. The MAPT framework is flexible, allowing the detection of varying levels of meaningful benefit or harm (or equivalence) on the basis of the burden of disease and the available treatments. Treatment comparisons will be evaluated as intervention domains on the platform in order to achieve the overarching objective. Specific objectives for each intervention domain will be included in intervention domain-specific protocol appendices. The primary outcome is a hierarchically assessed composite of death within 120 days, ambulation status at 120 days, and days alive and out of the hospital within 120 days of randomization. Secondary outcomes will include the components of the composite outcome and patient-reported outcomes. Participants will be contacted at 6 weeks, 4 months, 8 months, and 12 months after randomization to ascertain trial outcomes. The MAPT will enable researchers to efficiently evaluate multiple treatment options for patients with musculoskeletal impairments, which may improve patient care and outcomes globally. Clinical Relevance: The MAPT is clinically relevant because it provides a practical framework for rapidly identifying which treatments improve survival, mobility, and recovery in patients with musculoskeletal conditions. It can directly guide better treatment decisions regarding a leading cause of disability.

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), University of California, Irvine (US), Keck Hospital of USC (US), Faculty of 1000 (United States) (US), Impact (CA), Confluence Life Sciences (United States) (US), National Patient Safety Foundation (US), McMaster University (CA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.