Task Comprehension Strategies in Proof Construction – Methodological and Educational Issues

Abstract Many students have difficulty constructing proofs. To overcome these difficulties, developing a rich mental representation of the proving task could be helpful. Thus, using task comprehension strategies that support building such a mental representation could relate positively to proof construction. However, it is an open question how the use of these strategies can be measured in a large sample. Therefore, we addressed (a) methodological issues of measuring task comprehension strategies, before investigated the relationships between task comprehension strategies and (b) prior knowledge, and (c) performance on proof construction. Our results from a sample of 152 second-semester university students in Germany, who had already taken two proof-based courses, indicate that students’ self-reports of their strategy use and performance tests on their strategy use measure different abilities. In addition, we found that prior knowledge influences performance on more advanced task comprehension strategies, such as inferring or evaluating examples, and proof construction. However, we could not confirm our hypotheses regarding the relation between strategy use for both measurements and performance on proof construction. In discussing these results and the limitations of our study, practical implications are also highlighted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-026-10679-7
Primary Topic
Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Task Comprehension Strategies in Proof Construction – Methodological and Educational Issues

Katharina Kirsten, Silke Neuhaus
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education
Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
article

Task Comprehension Strategies in Proof Construction – Methodological and Educational Issues

Katharina Kirsten, Silke Neuhaus
article en

Abstract

Abstract Many students have difficulty constructing proofs. To overcome these difficulties, developing a rich mental representation of the proving task could be helpful. Thus, using task comprehension strategies that support building such a mental representation could relate positively to proof construction. However, it is an open question how the use of these strategies can be measured in a large sample. Therefore, we addressed (a) methodological issues of measuring task comprehension strategies, before investigated the relationships between task comprehension strategies and (b) prior knowledge, and (c) performance on proof construction. Our results from a sample of 152 second-semester university students in Germany, who had already taken two proof-based courses, indicate that students’ self-reports of their strategy use and performance tests on their strategy use measure different abilities. In addition, we found that prior knowledge influences performance on more advanced task comprehension strategies, such as inferring or evaluating examples, and proof construction. However, we could not confirm our hypotheses regarding the relation between strategy use for both measurements and performance on proof construction. In discussing these results and the limitations of our study, practical implications are also highlighted.

International Journal of Science and Mathematics EducationVol. 24(5)
University of Münster (DE), University of Würzburg (DE)
Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.