Toward trustworthy healthcare AI: designing academic research for translation readiness

In controlled proof-of-concept studies, healthcare artificial intelligence (AI) systems now routinely match or exceed specialist-level performance. Despite these impressive technical achievements, most systems remain confined to research settings, highlighting an opportunity to better prepare academic AI research for subsequent clinical translation. Successful translation requires attention to technical, regulatory, organizational, and infrastructural factors, ideally from the earliest stages of research. This Perspective focuses on trustworthiness as a key factor that academic researchers can address proactively. First, we outline how trustworthiness requirements differ across three stakeholder groups-patients, clinicians, and regulatory bodies-and how academic research can better align with these expectations. We then discuss key dimensions of trustworthy AI-explainability, uncertainty quantification, and evaluation-and how researchers can address them during study design. We also consider foundation models, which require adapted validation approaches. Based on this analysis, we propose a stakeholder-centered framework that emphasizes proactive integration of trust requirements during early development phases rather than post hoc considerations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Molecular Systems Biology
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44320-026-00219-4
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Toward trustworthy healthcare AI: designing academic research for translation readiness

Achim Hekler, Florian Buettner
Molecular Systems Biology
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Toward trustworthy healthcare AI: designing academic research for translation readiness

Achim Hekler, Florian Buettner
article en

Abstract

In controlled proof-of-concept studies, healthcare artificial intelligence (AI) systems now routinely match or exceed specialist-level performance. Despite these impressive technical achievements, most systems remain confined to research settings, highlighting an opportunity to better prepare academic AI research for subsequent clinical translation. Successful translation requires attention to technical, regulatory, organizational, and infrastructural factors, ideally from the earliest stages of research. This Perspective focuses on trustworthiness as a key factor that academic researchers can address proactively. First, we outline how trustworthiness requirements differ across three stakeholder groups-patients, clinicians, and regulatory bodies-and how academic research can better align with these expectations. We then discuss key dimensions of trustworthy AI-explainability, uncertainty quantification, and evaluation-and how researchers can address them during study design. We also consider foundation models, which require adapted validation approaches. Based on this analysis, we propose a stakeholder-centered framework that emphasizes proactive integration of trust requirements during early development phases rather than post hoc considerations.

Molecular Systems Biology
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE), German Cancer Research Center (DE), Heidelberg University (DE), University Hospital Frankfurt (DE), DKFZ-ZMBH Alliance (DE), Frankfurt Cancer Institute (DE)
European Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.