The practitioner–researcher divide in Industrial, Work, and Organizational (IWO) psychology: Reflections on progress and the challenges ahead

Abstract A quarter‐century has passed since the publication of ‘The practitioner–researcher divide in Industrial, Work and Organizational (IWO) psychology’ ( Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology , 2001, 74, 391 ‐ 411). In this commentary, I revisit our original objectives and assess the progress made in addressing the existential threat we identified. Despite stimulating extensive debate, the problems we documented remain largely unresolved and, in many respects, have intensified and now extend well beyond IWO psychology. Drawing on recent developments in research assessment, impact governance, and responsible science, I argue that addressing these challenges requires fundamental reforms to the wider knowledge production ecosystem, against a backdrop of growing public scepticism towards scientific evidence and expertise.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.70117
Primary Topic
Occupational and Professional Licensing Regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The practitioner–researcher divide in Industrial, Work, and Organizational (IWO) psychology: Reflections on progress and the challenges ahead

Gerard P. Hodgkinson
Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
Occupational and Professional Licensing Regulation
article

The practitioner–researcher divide in Industrial, Work, and Organizational (IWO) psychology: Reflections on progress and the challenges ahead

Gerard P. Hodgkinson
article en

Abstract

Abstract A quarter‐century has passed since the publication of ‘The practitioner–researcher divide in Industrial, Work and Organizational (IWO) psychology’ ( Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology , 2001, 74, 391 ‐ 411). In this commentary, I revisit our original objectives and assess the progress made in addressing the existential threat we identified. Despite stimulating extensive debate, the problems we documented remain largely unresolved and, in many respects, have intensified and now extend well beyond IWO psychology. Drawing on recent developments in research assessment, impact governance, and responsible science, I argue that addressing these challenges requires fundamental reforms to the wider knowledge production ecosystem, against a backdrop of growing public scepticism towards scientific evidence and expertise.

Journal of Occupational and Organizational PsychologyVol. 99(2)
University of Manchester (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Occupational and Professional Licensing Regulation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.