Trial characteristics and results reporting among oncology clinical trials involving African countries.

1589 Background: Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) faced ~801,000 new cancer cases and ~520,000 cancer deaths in 2020, with deaths projected to reach 1 million annually by 2030. African trial activity remains scarce (<1% of global trials), with sparse reporting. We measured results reporting for oncology trials involving African sites and identified trial characteristics associated with results disclosure. Methods: Using ClinicalTrials.gov, we identified 1,140 completed oncology trials (1992-2023) involving ≥1 African site. We classified trials by country, institution, region, and funder, reporting proportions, ORs (95% CI), and multivariable logistic regression. Results: Among 1,140 trials across 38 countries, most were single-country (93.7%), single-institution (76.7%), and North Africa only (58.2%). Most were non-industry-sponsored (68.8%), interventional (79.5%) and randomized (61.1%). Enrollment was ≤100 participants in 666 trials (58.4%). Overall, 25.2% posted results. Multi-country trials reported more than single-country (59.7% vs 22.8%); multi-institution exceeded single-institution (60.5% vs 14.4%). SSA-only (48.0%) and both-region trials (72.1%) exceeded North-Africa-only (7.2%). Industry-funded reported more than non-industry (70.5% vs 4.6%). Phase III exceeded other phases (64.0% vs 10.6%). In multivariable analysis, industry sponsorship, multi-institution and multi-country configuration, SSA region, and phase 3 status were independently associated with results posting (Table 1). Conclusions: Nearly three-quarters of completed oncology trials conducted in Africa have not publicly reported results, highlighting substantial research waste and a critical ethical failure to translate participant contributions into accessible evidence. This analysis identifies independent, actionable determinants of reporting transparency. Strengthening African clinical trial infrastructure and coupling reporting requirements with systematic monitoring and accountability are essential to improve evidence generation and promote equity as the continent’s cancer burden continues to rise. Multivariable predictors of results reporting. Predictor Adjusted OR (95% CI) p-value Industry funding (ref: non-industry) 28.40 (19.1-42.2) 0.001 Multi-institution (ref: single) 5.81 (4.08-8.26) 0.001 Multi-country (ref: single) 2.12 (1.18-3.81) 0.012 Sub-Saharan only (ref: North Africa) 6.82 (4.68-9.94) 0.001 Both regions (ref: North Africa) 8.46 (3.45-20.7) 0.001 Phase 3 (ref: other/NA) 3.24 (2.26-4.64) 0.001 Interventional (ref: observational) 4.12 (1.48-11.5) 0.007 Enrollment >100 (ref: ≤100) 1.89 (1.32-2.71) 0.001

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.1589
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trial characteristics and results reporting among oncology clinical trials involving African countries.

Grace Gorecki, Adeoluwa Adewuyi, Abner A. Murray, Stanley Ozogbo et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Ethics in Clinical Research
article

Trial characteristics and results reporting among oncology clinical trials involving African countries.

Grace Gorecki, Adeoluwa Adewuyi, Abner A. Murray, Stanley Ozogbo, Oyepeju Abioye, Inemesit Akpan, Timilehin Abioye, Folajimi J. Atunde, Narjust Florez, Olayinka Abosede Fakorede
article en

Abstract

1589 Background: Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) faced ~801,000 new cancer cases and ~520,000 cancer deaths in 2020, with deaths projected to reach 1 million annually by 2030. African trial activity remains scarce (<1% of global trials), with sparse reporting. We measured results reporting for oncology trials involving African sites and identified trial characteristics associated with results disclosure. Methods: Using ClinicalTrials.gov, we identified 1,140 completed oncology trials (1992-2023) involving ≥1 African site. We classified trials by country, institution, region, and funder, reporting proportions, ORs (95% CI), and multivariable logistic regression. Results: Among 1,140 trials across 38 countries, most were single-country (93.7%), single-institution (76.7%), and North Africa only (58.2%). Most were non-industry-sponsored (68.8%), interventional (79.5%) and randomized (61.1%). Enrollment was ≤100 participants in 666 trials (58.4%). Overall, 25.2% posted results. Multi-country trials reported more than single-country (59.7% vs 22.8%); multi-institution exceeded single-institution (60.5% vs 14.4%). SSA-only (48.0%) and both-region trials (72.1%) exceeded North-Africa-only (7.2%). Industry-funded reported more than non-industry (70.5% vs 4.6%). Phase III exceeded other phases (64.0% vs 10.6%). In multivariable analysis, industry sponsorship, multi-institution and multi-country configuration, SSA region, and phase 3 status were independently associated with results posting (Table 1). Conclusions: Nearly three-quarters of completed oncology trials conducted in Africa have not publicly reported results, highlighting substantial research waste and a critical ethical failure to translate participant contributions into accessible evidence. This analysis identifies independent, actionable determinants of reporting transparency. Strengthening African clinical trial infrastructure and coupling reporting requirements with systematic monitoring and accountability are essential to improve evidence generation and promote equity as the continent’s cancer burden continues to rise. Multivariable predictors of results reporting. Predictor Adjusted OR (95% CI) p-value Industry funding (ref: non-industry) 28.40 (19.1-42.2) 0.001 Multi-institution (ref: single) 5.81 (4.08-8.26) 0.001 Multi-country (ref: single) 2.12 (1.18-3.81) 0.012 Sub-Saharan only (ref: North Africa) 6.82 (4.68-9.94) 0.001 Both regions (ref: North Africa) 8.46 (3.45-20.7) 0.001 Phase 3 (ref: other/NA) 3.24 (2.26-4.64) 0.001 Interventional (ref: observational) 4.12 (1.48-11.5) 0.007 Enrollment >100 (ref: ≤100) 1.89 (1.32-2.71) 0.001

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Allegheny Health Network (US), Harvard University (US), University of Lagos (NG), Augusta University (US), Sinai Hospital (US), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US), Northeast Georgia Medical Center (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Ethics in Clinical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.