Radiotherapy use among locally advanced cervical cancer patients (LACC) in the United States community oncology setting.

5523 Background: Brachytherapy with concurrent chemoradiation +/- pembrolizumab is the current standard of care for LACC. American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) recommends external beam radiation therapy (EBRT)+brachytherapy, and since 2020 has recommended intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) over other forms of EBRT due to reduced toxicity risk. However, real-world evidence is needed to characterize patient outcomes based on the type of radiation received. Methods: Electronic medical record (EMR) data from The US Oncology Network identified adult LACC (FIGO 2018 Stage IB3-IVA) patients (pts) diagnosed between July 2018 – July 2022 and followed through June 2024. Pts were stratified by receipt of IMRT or Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) and brachytherapy during the observation period. Patient characteristics and provider-documented progression were assessed descriptively. Results: This study included 250 LACC pts; 73 (29%) pts received IMRT or VMAT, 177 (71%) pts received other forms of EBRT; and 189 (76%) pts received brachytherapy. Overall, 61 pts (24%) received both IMRT or VMAT and brachytherapy. Among the 148 pts who were diagnosed in 2020 or later, 28% received IMRT or VMAT. Disease progression occurred among 14% of IMRT or VMAT pts and 63% of non IMRT or VMAT patients; progression was similar across brachytherapy and non-brachytherapy patients. Conclusions: Advanced radiation techniques such as IMRT or VMAT and brachytherapy are associated with improved outcomes for patients with LACC, yet their combined use only occurs among 1 in 4 LACC patients, which is notably less than clinical trials. These findings present an opportunity to broaden adoption of evidence-based radiation strategies, supporting optimal treatment delivery and improved patient outcomes. IMRT or VMAT non IMRT or VMAT Brachytherapy Non-brachytherapy Patient, N 73 177 189 61 Age (yrs, median) 51 54 51 59 Race (White), N(%) 50 (69) 101 (57) 114 (60) 37 (60) Race (non-White), N(%) 9 (12) 36 (20) 35 (19) 10 (16) Race (not documented), N(%) 14 (19) 40 (23) 40 (21) 14 (23) Stage I-II, N(%) 31 (42) 82 (46) 94 (50) 19 (31) Stage III, N(%) 23 (32) 65 (37) 64 (34) 24 (39) Stage IVA, N(%) 6 (8) 10 (6) 11 (6) 5 (8) Progression, N(%) 24 (14) 46 (63) 55 (29) 15 (25)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.5523
Primary Topic
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Radiotherapy use among locally advanced cervical cancer patients (LACC) in the United States community oncology setting.

Audrey P. Garrett, Ila Sruti, Elizabeth A. Szamreta, Chuck Wentworth et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
article

Radiotherapy use among locally advanced cervical cancer patients (LACC) in the United States community oncology setting.

Audrey P. Garrett, Ila Sruti, Elizabeth A. Szamreta, Chuck Wentworth, Gregory Patton, Jinhong Guo
article en

Abstract

5523 Background: Brachytherapy with concurrent chemoradiation +/- pembrolizumab is the current standard of care for LACC. American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) recommends external beam radiation therapy (EBRT)+brachytherapy, and since 2020 has recommended intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) over other forms of EBRT due to reduced toxicity risk. However, real-world evidence is needed to characterize patient outcomes based on the type of radiation received. Methods: Electronic medical record (EMR) data from The US Oncology Network identified adult LACC (FIGO 2018 Stage IB3-IVA) patients (pts) diagnosed between July 2018 – July 2022 and followed through June 2024. Pts were stratified by receipt of IMRT or Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) and brachytherapy during the observation period. Patient characteristics and provider-documented progression were assessed descriptively. Results: This study included 250 LACC pts; 73 (29%) pts received IMRT or VMAT, 177 (71%) pts received other forms of EBRT; and 189 (76%) pts received brachytherapy. Overall, 61 pts (24%) received both IMRT or VMAT and brachytherapy. Among the 148 pts who were diagnosed in 2020 or later, 28% received IMRT or VMAT. Disease progression occurred among 14% of IMRT or VMAT pts and 63% of non IMRT or VMAT patients; progression was similar across brachytherapy and non-brachytherapy patients. Conclusions: Advanced radiation techniques such as IMRT or VMAT and brachytherapy are associated with improved outcomes for patients with LACC, yet their combined use only occurs among 1 in 4 LACC patients, which is notably less than clinical trials. These findings present an opportunity to broaden adoption of evidence-based radiation strategies, supporting optimal treatment delivery and improved patient outcomes. IMRT or VMAT non IMRT or VMAT Brachytherapy Non-brachytherapy Patient, N 73 177 189 61 Age (yrs, median) 51 54 51 59 Race (White), N(%) 50 (69) 101 (57) 114 (60) 37 (60) Race (non-White), N(%) 9 (12) 36 (20) 35 (19) 10 (16) Race (not documented), N(%) 14 (19) 40 (23) 40 (21) 14 (23) Stage I-II, N(%) 31 (42) 82 (46) 94 (50) 19 (31) Stage III, N(%) 23 (32) 65 (37) 64 (34) 24 (39) Stage IVA, N(%) 6 (8) 10 (6) 11 (6) 5 (8) Progression, N(%) 24 (14) 46 (63) 55 (29) 15 (25)

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) (US), Willamette Valley Cancer Institute and Research Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.