Inpatient financial toxicity among women hospitalized with breast cancer in the United States, 2013–2022.

1555 Background: Financial toxicity is an increasingly recognized consequence of cancer care. While the outpatient costs of breast cancer are well described, national trends and drivers of inpatient financial toxicity are not well understood. We evaluated temporal trends in hospitalization volume, inflation-adjusted inpatient charges, and factors associated with high financial toxicity among women hospitalized with breast cancer in the United States. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of the National Inpatient Sample (2013–2022), including women aged ≥18 years with a breast cancer diagnosis. Survey weights, strata, and clusters were applied. Charges were inflation-adjusted to 2022 USD. High financial toxicity was defined as inpatient charges ≥75th percentile. Temporal trends were assessed using weighted regression, and multivariable survey-weighted logistic regression identified predictors of high financial toxicity. Results: An estimated 1.70 million weighted hospitalizations were identified. Annual hospitalizations declined significantly (P for trend <0.001), from 178,660 in 2013 to 168,630 in 2022, with a nadir in 2020. In contrast, mean inflation-adjusted inpatient charges increased by 35.5%, from $58,869 to $79,797 (P for trend <0.001), totaling more than $119.3 billion in cumulative charges. Most hospitalizations occurred at urban teaching hospitals (71.2%). On multivariable analysis, urban teaching (OR 3.84, 95% CI 3.58–4.12) and urban non-teaching hospitals (OR 3.53, 95% CI 3.28–3.79) had nearly four-fold higher odds of high financial toxicity compared with rural hospitals. Compared with White patients, Hispanic (OR 1.53), Asian/Pacific Islander (OR 1.44), and Black patients (OR 1.10) had higher odds. Private insurance (OR 1.14) and residence in the highest income quartile (OR 1.35) were associated with increased odds, while older age was associated with lower odds. Odds of high financial toxicity increased steadily over time, peaking in 2020 (OR 1.58) (P for trend <0.001). Conclusions: Despite declining hospitalization rates, inpatient financial toxicity among women with breast cancer has worsened substantially, driven primarily by hospital setting and structural factors. Racial and ethnic disparities were also evident, with minority groups experiencing higher odds of high inpatient charges. These findings underscore the need for value-based strategies and policy interventions to mitigate inpatient financial burden in oncology care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.1555
Primary Topic
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inpatient financial toxicity among women hospitalized with breast cancer in the United States, 2013–2022.

Kamleshun Ramphul, Fathima Shehnaz Ayoobkhan, Ahmad Iftikhar, Divya Solipuram
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
article

Inpatient financial toxicity among women hospitalized with breast cancer in the United States, 2013–2022.

Kamleshun Ramphul, Fathima Shehnaz Ayoobkhan, Ahmad Iftikhar, Divya Solipuram
article en

Abstract

1555 Background: Financial toxicity is an increasingly recognized consequence of cancer care. While the outpatient costs of breast cancer are well described, national trends and drivers of inpatient financial toxicity are not well understood. We evaluated temporal trends in hospitalization volume, inflation-adjusted inpatient charges, and factors associated with high financial toxicity among women hospitalized with breast cancer in the United States. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of the National Inpatient Sample (2013–2022), including women aged ≥18 years with a breast cancer diagnosis. Survey weights, strata, and clusters were applied. Charges were inflation-adjusted to 2022 USD. High financial toxicity was defined as inpatient charges ≥75th percentile. Temporal trends were assessed using weighted regression, and multivariable survey-weighted logistic regression identified predictors of high financial toxicity. Results: An estimated 1.70 million weighted hospitalizations were identified. Annual hospitalizations declined significantly (P for trend <0.001), from 178,660 in 2013 to 168,630 in 2022, with a nadir in 2020. In contrast, mean inflation-adjusted inpatient charges increased by 35.5%, from $58,869 to $79,797 (P for trend <0.001), totaling more than $119.3 billion in cumulative charges. Most hospitalizations occurred at urban teaching hospitals (71.2%). On multivariable analysis, urban teaching (OR 3.84, 95% CI 3.58–4.12) and urban non-teaching hospitals (OR 3.53, 95% CI 3.28–3.79) had nearly four-fold higher odds of high financial toxicity compared with rural hospitals. Compared with White patients, Hispanic (OR 1.53), Asian/Pacific Islander (OR 1.44), and Black patients (OR 1.10) had higher odds. Private insurance (OR 1.14) and residence in the highest income quartile (OR 1.35) were associated with increased odds, while older age was associated with lower odds. Odds of high financial toxicity increased steadily over time, peaking in 2020 (OR 1.58) (P for trend <0.001). Conclusions: Despite declining hospitalization rates, inpatient financial toxicity among women with breast cancer has worsened substantially, driven primarily by hospital setting and structural factors. Racial and ethnic disparities were also evident, with minority groups experiencing higher odds of high inpatient charges. These findings underscore the need for value-based strategies and policy interventions to mitigate inpatient financial burden in oncology care.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
Trinity Health (US), University of Arizona (US), Medical University of South Carolina (US), Wayne State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.