Development and validation of an instrument for assessing aesthetic education

Abstract Amidst the growing recognition of aesthetic education as a foundation for students’ holistic development, China has witnessed a surge in policy-driven initiatives. However, research on psychometrically robust instruments to assess aesthetic education remains scarce. This study addresses this gap by proposing and validating the IMPACT model, a six-dimensional framework encompassing Imagination, Moral Force, Perception, Aesthetic Judgement, Creativity, and Tenacity. Drawing on classical aesthetic theory and contemporary educational psychology, the study developed a 36-item instrument refined through expert consultation, pilot interviews with teachers and students, as well as empirical analyses using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis (EFA and CFA). Two empirical studies involving middle school students from Chongqing, Shanghai, and Shenzhen were conducted. Study 1 ( n = 476) used EFA to identify a six-factor structure, resulting in the retention of 34 items. Study 2 ( n = 478) applied CFA, demonstrating good model fit (CFI = 0.93, TLI = 0.92, RMSEA = 0.05, SRMR = 0.03) and strong factor loadings (>0.75). All dimensions exhibited high internal consistency (α > 0.70). The findings support the reliability and construct validity of a multidimensional, integrative model. The IMPACT instrument offers a theoretically grounded and empirically validated tool for advancing research and practice in adolescent aesthetic education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-07523-2
Primary Topic
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and validation of an instrument for assessing aesthetic education

Miao Yang, Mingxin An, Qiang Zhao, Ruiqi Li et al.
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
article

Development and validation of an instrument for assessing aesthetic education

Miao Yang, Mingxin An, Qiang Zhao, Ruiqi Li, Xin Gao, Shuai Wang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Amidst the growing recognition of aesthetic education as a foundation for students’ holistic development, China has witnessed a surge in policy-driven initiatives. However, research on psychometrically robust instruments to assess aesthetic education remains scarce. This study addresses this gap by proposing and validating the IMPACT model, a six-dimensional framework encompassing Imagination, Moral Force, Perception, Aesthetic Judgement, Creativity, and Tenacity. Drawing on classical aesthetic theory and contemporary educational psychology, the study developed a 36-item instrument refined through expert consultation, pilot interviews with teachers and students, as well as empirical analyses using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis (EFA and CFA). Two empirical studies involving middle school students from Chongqing, Shanghai, and Shenzhen were conducted. Study 1 ( n = 476) used EFA to identify a six-factor structure, resulting in the retention of 34 items. Study 2 ( n = 478) applied CFA, demonstrating good model fit (CFI = 0.93, TLI = 0.92, RMSEA = 0.05, SRMR = 0.03) and strong factor loadings (>0.75). All dimensions exhibited high internal consistency (α > 0.70). The findings support the reliability and construct validity of a multidimensional, integrative model. The IMPACT instrument offers a theoretically grounded and empirically validated tool for advancing research and practice in adolescent aesthetic education.

Humanities and Social Sciences CommunicationsVol. 13(1)
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), Northeast Normal University (CN), Amsterdam University of the Arts (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL), Tsinghua University (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.