Cabozantinib plus nivolumab (C+N) versus sunitinib (S) in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) and liver metastasis: Subgroup analysis of the phase 3 CheckMate-9ER trial.
4530 Background: In the phase 3 CheckMate 9ER trial (NCT03141177), C+N treatment significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR) vs S in patients with first-line aRCC, including those with baseline LM (Motzer et al. Ann Oncol 2026). We performed exploratory analyses of outcomes in additional subgroups including patients with no LM (NLM) and those with LM plus other metastatic sites. Methods: 651 patients with clear-cell aRCC were randomized 1:1 to C (40 mg QD) + N (240 mg Q2W) or S (50 mg QD for 4 weeks of 6-week cycles). PFS (primary endpoint) and ORR were per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review. Median f-u was 67.6 mo. Patient subgroups analyzed included those with LM or NLM at baseline and those with bone, lung, lymph node (LN), or adrenal gland metastasis in addition to LM. Results: 129 patients had LM at baseline. Baseline characteristics were generally consistent between treatment arms among patients with LM and NLM. A PFS and OS benefit with C+N vs S was observed in patients with LM and NLM (Table). Both subgroups experienced greater ORR and longer duration of response (DOR) with C+N vs S. Although outcomes were less favorable in those with vs without LM, and least favorable in those with both LM and bone metastasis, the relative benefit with C+N vs S was consistent across metastatic site subgroups. The safety profile among patients with LM was generally consistent with the overall population. Presence of LM did not negatively impact C dose exposure (median daily dose 31.8 mg in LM; 26.3 mg in NLM). Conclusions: Treatment with C+N vs S improved efficacy outcomes in patients with first-line aRCC irrespective of LM at baseline. Among patients with LM, a consistent benefit was observed regardless of concomitant metastasis in bone, lung, LN, or adrenal gland. Clinical trial information: NCT03141177 . Efficacy by metastatic sites. Subgroup(C+N v S) LM + Any Site(s) a (n=73 v n=56) NLM(n=250 v n=272) LM + Bone(n=15 v n=17) LM + Lung(n=46 v n=43) LM + LN(n=31 v n=27) LM + Adrenal Gland(n=8 v n=6) mPFS, mo 10.9 v 6.2 b 18.4 v 9.2 6.9 v 3.8 9.1 v 4.1 9.7 v 6.2 32.0 v 2.0 PFS HR (95% CI) 0.55 (0.37, 0.82) b 0.59 (0.48, 0.71) 0.77 (0.33, 1.76) 0.50 (0.32, 0.80) 0.65 (0.36, 1.17) 0.18 (0.04, 0.78) mOS, mo 37.6 v 22.1 b 49.5 v 39.7 20.9 v 12.7 40.1 v 13.4 34.8 v 13.4 46.3 v 2.0 OS HR (95% CI) 0.65 (0.43, 0.97) b <
Authors
- Lana Andrianova
- Amishi Y. Shah (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9007-0621)
- C. Porta
- Denise Williamson
- José Ricardo Pérez
- Maite Bourlon
- S D George
- Andrea B. Apolo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9409-1836)
- Tasha D. Hall
- Thomas Powles
- Joshua Zhang
- Toni K. Choueiri
- Bernard Escudier
- Cristina Suárez
- Robert J. Motzer
Institutions
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Exelixis (United States) (US)
- Queen Mary University of London (GB)
- Barts Health NHS Trust (GB)
- Institut Gustave Roussy (FR)
- Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States) (US)
- Azienda Universitaria Ospedaliera Consorziale - Policlinico Bari (IT)
- Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán (MX)
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
- Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari (ES)
- National Cancer Institute (US)
- Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center (US)
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (ES)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2026-05-27
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.4530
- Primary Topic
- Renal cell carcinoma treatment
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Exelixis