Measuring Nuclear Democracy: A Large-Scale Analysis of German Nuclear Energy Discourse

Nuclear energy has been a highly controversial issue in post-war (West) German politics. Previous research has identified discourse on nuclear energy as an important factor in the development of German political culture. However, little work has been done on the quantitative analysis of this discourse, despite the availability of large amounts of text data. We use large language models to classify texts in a corpus of Bundestag proceedings and news articles according to speakers’ stance and framing. In combination with the texts’ metadata, this enables us to draw conclusions about the positions taken by political parties and media publications on nuclear energy over time. We find that while media reporting remained mostly neutral, Bundestag speakers became divided on the issue along party lines by the 1970s. The framing of nuclear energy in both media and politics shifted in response to events and policy needs. More generally, our approach could be applied to other problems in discourse analysis where large amounts of data are available but no high-quality annotations for classifier training exist.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Histories
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/histories6020034
Primary Topic
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring Nuclear Democracy: A Large-Scale Analysis of German Nuclear Energy Discourse

Thomas Haider, Arne Cypionka, Malte Rehbein, Maximilian Teich
Histories
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
article

Measuring Nuclear Democracy: A Large-Scale Analysis of German Nuclear Energy Discourse

Thomas Haider, Arne Cypionka, Malte Rehbein, Maximilian Teich
article en

Abstract

Nuclear energy has been a highly controversial issue in post-war (West) German politics. Previous research has identified discourse on nuclear energy as an important factor in the development of German political culture. However, little work has been done on the quantitative analysis of this discourse, despite the availability of large amounts of text data. We use large language models to classify texts in a corpus of Bundestag proceedings and news articles according to speakers’ stance and framing. In combination with the texts’ metadata, this enables us to draw conclusions about the positions taken by political parties and media publications on nuclear energy over time. We find that while media reporting remained mostly neutral, Bundestag speakers became divided on the issue along party lines by the 1970s. The framing of nuclear energy in both media and politics shifted in response to events and policy needs. More generally, our approach could be applied to other problems in discourse analysis where large amounts of data are available but no high-quality annotations for classifier training exist.

HistoriesVol. 6(2)
University of Passau (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.