First-line immune checkpoint inhibitors in elderly colorectal cancer patients in the real world: Retrospective phase of the multicenter ELDER CRC trial.

3539 Background: dMMR/MSI-H metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is more common among the elderly. However, insufficient data about their treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are available from interventional and observational trials. Methods: ELDER CRC is an observational, multicenter Italian trial enrolling elderly (≥70 years [yrs]) patients (pts) treated with first-line ICI(s) for dMMR/MSI-H mCRC in the real world. Results from the retrospective cohort are presented. Results: 132 pts aged 77 yrs as median (IQR 74-82, range 70-93; <75: 32.6%; 75-79: 29.5%; ≥80: 37.9%) were enrolled across 10 Centers. They were mainly female (56.1%) in mediocre conditions (ECOG PS 1: 51.9%, ≥2: 22.2%; G8 ≤14: 80.5% [33/41 available]) with BRAF mutated (58.9% [73/124]), right primary tumor (80%), and synchronous metastases (54.5%) involving liver (34.8%) and/or peritoneum (37.9%). Almost all pts received monotherapy (pembrolizumab or nivolumab: 98.5%; nivolumab+ipilimumab: 1.5%) and most discontinued for PD (31.1%) or completion of 2 yrs (13.6%). 65.2% had an adverse event (AE), mainly fatigue (37.9%), skin rash (20.5%), hypothyroidism (17.4%), diarrhea (15.9%), and arthralgia (12.9%). Only 11% had G3-4 AE (G5=0), mainly gastrointestinal (3.8%), lung (3%), and fatigue (2.3%) and 10.6% discontinued ICI for AE. On 122 evaluable pts, ORR was 51.6% (38.5% PR + 13.1% CR) with 26.2% SD and 22.1% primary PD. At median follow-up of 25.9 months [mos] (22.3-30.3), mPFS was 32.2 mos (26.2-NE) with 56 events and mOS 45.8 mos (32.2-NE) with 46 events. 28.8% are still on treatment at the time of this analysis. Survival outcomes were not influenced by age groups. G8 >14 was related with better PFS (HR=0.79, p =0.06) and OS (HR=0.89, p =0.09). At multivariable model only neutrophils/lymphocytes ratio ≥3 was significantly associated with worse PFS (HR=1.91, p =0.03), while no variables with OS. Conclusions: Our results confirm the benefit of first-line immunotherapy for dMMR/MSI-H mCRC even among elderly pts treated in the real world, despite the substantial rate of right-sided and/or BRAF mut CRC pts and regardless of age group. The manageable safety profile of ICI(s) was also confirmed. G8 might be predictive of outcome but needs implementation in daily practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.3539
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

First-line immune checkpoint inhibitors in elderly colorectal cancer patients in the real world: Retrospective phase of the multicenter ELDER CRC trial.

Linda Di Francesco, Maria Alessandra Calegari, Ina Valeria Zurlo, Alberto Puccini et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
article

First-line immune checkpoint inhibitors in elderly colorectal cancer patients in the real world: Retrospective phase of the multicenter ELDER CRC trial.

Linda Di Francesco, Maria Alessandra Calegari, Ina Valeria Zurlo, Alberto Puccini, Alessandra Boccaccino, Chiara Gallio, Anna Amela Valsecchi, Cristina Morelli, C Ghirardini, Martina Cassaniti, L Antonuzzo, Gabriele Ferrari, Daniele Rossini, Claudia Airaghi, Giulia Massaro, Fabio Gelsomino, Stefano Tamberi, Lisa Salvatore
article en

Abstract

3539 Background: dMMR/MSI-H metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is more common among the elderly. However, insufficient data about their treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are available from interventional and observational trials. Methods: ELDER CRC is an observational, multicenter Italian trial enrolling elderly (≥70 years [yrs]) patients (pts) treated with first-line ICI(s) for dMMR/MSI-H mCRC in the real world. Results from the retrospective cohort are presented. Results: 132 pts aged 77 yrs as median (IQR 74-82, range 70-93; <75: 32.6%; 75-79: 29.5%; ≥80: 37.9%) were enrolled across 10 Centers. They were mainly female (56.1%) in mediocre conditions (ECOG PS 1: 51.9%, ≥2: 22.2%; G8 ≤14: 80.5% [33/41 available]) with BRAF mutated (58.9% [73/124]), right primary tumor (80%), and synchronous metastases (54.5%) involving liver (34.8%) and/or peritoneum (37.9%). Almost all pts received monotherapy (pembrolizumab or nivolumab: 98.5%; nivolumab+ipilimumab: 1.5%) and most discontinued for PD (31.1%) or completion of 2 yrs (13.6%). 65.2% had an adverse event (AE), mainly fatigue (37.9%), skin rash (20.5%), hypothyroidism (17.4%), diarrhea (15.9%), and arthralgia (12.9%). Only 11% had G3-4 AE (G5=0), mainly gastrointestinal (3.8%), lung (3%), and fatigue (2.3%) and 10.6% discontinued ICI for AE. On 122 evaluable pts, ORR was 51.6% (38.5% PR + 13.1% CR) with 26.2% SD and 22.1% primary PD. At median follow-up of 25.9 months [mos] (22.3-30.3), mPFS was 32.2 mos (26.2-NE) with 56 events and mOS 45.8 mos (32.2-NE) with 46 events. 28.8% are still on treatment at the time of this analysis. Survival outcomes were not influenced by age groups. G8 >14 was related with better PFS (HR=0.79, p =0.06) and OS (HR=0.89, p =0.09). At multivariable model only neutrophils/lymphocytes ratio ≥3 was significantly associated with worse PFS (HR=1.91, p =0.03), while no variables with OS. Conclusions: Our results confirm the benefit of first-line immunotherapy for dMMR/MSI-H mCRC even among elderly pts treated in the real world, despite the substantial rate of right-sided and/or BRAF mut CRC pts and regardless of age group. The manageable safety profile of ICI(s) was also confirmed. G8 might be predictive of outcome but needs implementation in daily practice.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT), University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT), University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT), Humanitas University (IT), University of Ferrara (IT), University of Pavia (IT), Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic (IT), Azienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino (IT), Ospedale "Santa Maria delle Croci" di Ravenna (IT), Fondazione Ricerca Molinette (IT), Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IT), Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale Della Romagna (IT), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi (IT), Policlinico San Matteo Fondazione (IT), Ospedale Vito Fazzi (IT), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital (IT), University of Florence (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.