Safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in older patients with locally advanced colon cancer (LACC): Results from FOxTROT 1 and the FOxTROT 2 safety cohort population.

3653 Background: The FOxTROT1 (FT1; NCT00647530) trial demonstrated feasibility and efficacy of six weeks of NAC for LACC compared with upfront surgery. The currently recruiting FOxTROT2 trial (ISRCTN83842641) is testing this approach in older or frail patients. Outcomes in older patients with LACC are inferior; therefore, new treatment strategies are required. Here in these trials we analyse the safety and efficacy of NAC in this group and report the DFS in the older subgroup of FT1 PMMR patients. Methods: Data from FT1 and the planned FT2 safety pilot (n=150) were combined and analysed by treatment arm and by age category (</> 70). Pre-specified endpoints included NAC delivery and perioperative complication rates for FT1 and FT2; DFS and pathological response are reported for FT1 patients by MMR status. We will update safety data for this presentation. Results: In FT1 292/1052 (27.8%) of patients were aged over 70; the median age of FT2 safety cohort was 76 (range 70-85). There were no significant differences by age in NAC delivery or in rates of peri-operative complications. For patients over 70, combining FT1&2 data, exploring those who received NAC, 88.5% completed the course as planned and 37.7% received an upfront or subsequent dose modification. Rates of peri-operative complications combining FT1&2 were similar between patients receiving NAC or upfront surgery: anastomotic leak (3.4% vs 3.3%), complication requiring hospital stay (FT1 9.3% vs 14.6%) or further surgery (2.6% vs 5.0%), and post-operative death (0.9 % vs 1.7%). For patients over 70 in FT1 16.4% were dMMR and 83.6% were pMMR. In pMMR patients overall NAC improved 3-year DFS (81.2% vs 75.4% without a DFS event; HR 0.70[0.52–0.94],p=0.02) compared with upfront surgery; results were consistent in older patients (81.2% vs 71.4%; HR 0.59[0.35-1.02],p=0.06). Conclusions: NAC is safe and well-tolerated in older adults, with no increase in perioperative morbidity and preserved treatment delivery compared to rates in younger patients and when compared with upfront surgery. Promising efficacy in terms of 3-year DFS and pathological response were observed in older patients with pMMR tumors, consistent to those seen in younger patients. These data support the use of NAC in older patients with LACC and continued recruitment to FT2 to evaluate the long term impact. Clinical trial information: NCT00647530 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.3653
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in older patients with locally advanced colon cancer (LACC): Results from FOxTROT 1 and the FOxTROT 2 safety cohort population.

C. Rosie Williams, James R. Platt, E. Connell, Aaisha Ali et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
article

Safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in older patients with locally advanced colon cancer (LACC): Results from FOxTROT 1 and the FOxTROT 2 safety cohort population.

C. Rosie Williams, James R. Platt, E. Connell, Aaisha Ali, Rhiannon Lambkin, David Allan Cairns, Faye Elliott, Dion Morton, Claire Dimbleby, Kelly Handley, Anna Perry, Andrew David Beggs, Nicholas West, Laura Magill, Nancy Fernandes da Silva, Jenny Seligmann, Matthew Seymour, Michael Braun, Janet Shirley Graham
article en

Abstract

3653 Background: The FOxTROT1 (FT1; NCT00647530) trial demonstrated feasibility and efficacy of six weeks of NAC for LACC compared with upfront surgery. The currently recruiting FOxTROT2 trial (ISRCTN83842641) is testing this approach in older or frail patients. Outcomes in older patients with LACC are inferior; therefore, new treatment strategies are required. Here in these trials we analyse the safety and efficacy of NAC in this group and report the DFS in the older subgroup of FT1 PMMR patients. Methods: Data from FT1 and the planned FT2 safety pilot (n=150) were combined and analysed by treatment arm and by age category (</> 70). Pre-specified endpoints included NAC delivery and perioperative complication rates for FT1 and FT2; DFS and pathological response are reported for FT1 patients by MMR status. We will update safety data for this presentation. Results: In FT1 292/1052 (27.8%) of patients were aged over 70; the median age of FT2 safety cohort was 76 (range 70-85). There were no significant differences by age in NAC delivery or in rates of peri-operative complications. For patients over 70, combining FT1&2 data, exploring those who received NAC, 88.5% completed the course as planned and 37.7% received an upfront or subsequent dose modification. Rates of peri-operative complications combining FT1&2 were similar between patients receiving NAC or upfront surgery: anastomotic leak (3.4% vs 3.3%), complication requiring hospital stay (FT1 9.3% vs 14.6%) or further surgery (2.6% vs 5.0%), and post-operative death (0.9 % vs 1.7%). For patients over 70 in FT1 16.4% were dMMR and 83.6% were pMMR. In pMMR patients overall NAC improved 3-year DFS (81.2% vs 75.4% without a DFS event; HR 0.70[0.52–0.94],p=0.02) compared with upfront surgery; results were consistent in older patients (81.2% vs 71.4%; HR 0.59[0.35-1.02],p=0.06). Conclusions: NAC is safe and well-tolerated in older adults, with no increase in perioperative morbidity and preserved treatment delivery compared to rates in younger patients and when compared with upfront surgery. Promising efficacy in terms of 3-year DFS and pathological response were observed in older patients with pMMR tumors, consistent to those seen in younger patients. These data support the use of NAC in older patients with LACC and continued recruitment to FT2 to evaluate the long term impact. Clinical trial information: NCT00647530 .

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
University of Leeds (GB), Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre (GB), St James's University Hospital (GB), The Christie Hospital (GB), The Christie NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University of Birmingham (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.