Prognostic potential of PROSTest for predicting outcome in ADT-treated Black South African prostate cancer patients.

5104 Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most common cancer in men with disproportionately aggressive disease observed in black African and Caribbean men. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is commonly used as treatment but there is no personalized strategy to guide patient selection. We investigated the prognostic value of PROSTest before ADT initiation and after the first ADT cycle. Methods: We performed a descriptive study of PROSTest with cross-sectional and longitudinal arms in black PCa patients receiving or intended to receive ADT. An ADT-naïve PCa cohort ( n =50) intended to start ADT was enrolled as well as an ADT-exposed cohort ( n =80) 6-12, 12-24 or >24 months after starting ADT. Goserelin acetate alone or in combination with cyproterone acetate was administered. The cohorts were followed up 4-monthly for 36 months with evaluation of survival and treatment response (responding, in remission, recurrence, progression, castration resistance). PSA levels were measured using the Architect Total PSA chemiluminescent immunoassay. Whole blood samples were collected into deproteinizing RNA-buffered tubes for determination of the PROSTest activity score using a multiplexed PCR assay. Statistical analysis used non-parametric statistics and Fisher’s exact test in GraphPad Prism v8. Results: Untreated metastatic PCa patients had the highest baseline PROSTest scores (71.8-85.3). Untreated patients with organ-confined disease were subdivided into group A (PROSTest scores ≤32) and group B (PROSTest scores ≥70). ADT-treated patients enrolled after starting ADT were subdivided into group C (PROSTest scores 9.8-58.3) and group D (PROSTest scores 70.0 – 90.2). Groups A and C showed improved survival and lower rates of recurrence, progression and castration resistance at 36 months compared to groups B and D (p<0.05). Patients that required treatment re-initiation or escalation due to rising PSA all had high enrolment PROSTest scores ≥70. The groups did not differ significantly in terms of age, CAPRA score, Gleason grade, PSA levels, nadir PSA, time to nadir or SUVMAX ( p >0.05). Conclusions: The PROSTest activity score determined pre- or post-ADT (first cycle) identifies PCa patients at risk for poor treatment outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.5104
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prognostic potential of PROSTest for predicting outcome in ADT-treated Black South African prostate cancer patients.

Ané Pieters, Mark Kidd, Kgomotso Mathabe, Robert P. Millar et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
article

Prognostic potential of PROSTest for predicting outcome in ADT-treated Black South African prostate cancer patients.

Ané Pieters, Mark Kidd, Kgomotso Mathabe, Robert P. Millar, S E Nagel
article en

Abstract

5104 Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most common cancer in men with disproportionately aggressive disease observed in black African and Caribbean men. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is commonly used as treatment but there is no personalized strategy to guide patient selection. We investigated the prognostic value of PROSTest before ADT initiation and after the first ADT cycle. Methods: We performed a descriptive study of PROSTest with cross-sectional and longitudinal arms in black PCa patients receiving or intended to receive ADT. An ADT-naïve PCa cohort ( n =50) intended to start ADT was enrolled as well as an ADT-exposed cohort ( n =80) 6-12, 12-24 or >24 months after starting ADT. Goserelin acetate alone or in combination with cyproterone acetate was administered. The cohorts were followed up 4-monthly for 36 months with evaluation of survival and treatment response (responding, in remission, recurrence, progression, castration resistance). PSA levels were measured using the Architect Total PSA chemiluminescent immunoassay. Whole blood samples were collected into deproteinizing RNA-buffered tubes for determination of the PROSTest activity score using a multiplexed PCR assay. Statistical analysis used non-parametric statistics and Fisher’s exact test in GraphPad Prism v8. Results: Untreated metastatic PCa patients had the highest baseline PROSTest scores (71.8-85.3). Untreated patients with organ-confined disease were subdivided into group A (PROSTest scores ≤32) and group B (PROSTest scores ≥70). ADT-treated patients enrolled after starting ADT were subdivided into group C (PROSTest scores 9.8-58.3) and group D (PROSTest scores 70.0 – 90.2). Groups A and C showed improved survival and lower rates of recurrence, progression and castration resistance at 36 months compared to groups B and D (p<0.05). Patients that required treatment re-initiation or escalation due to rising PSA all had high enrolment PROSTest scores ≥70. The groups did not differ significantly in terms of age, CAPRA score, Gleason grade, PSA levels, nadir PSA, time to nadir or SUVMAX ( p >0.05). Conclusions: The PROSTest activity score determined pre- or post-ADT (first cycle) identifies PCa patients at risk for poor treatment outcomes.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
Wren Laboratories (United States) (US), University of Pretoria (ZA)
South African Medical Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.