Invasive-field radiotherapy plus rituximab versus rituximab alone after response to immunochemotherapy in stage III follicular lymphoma: An open-label, multicenter, randomized clinical study.

7054 Background: Stage III follicular lymphoma (FL) remains incurable with immunochemotherapy followed by rituximab maintenance. Radiotherapy plays a critical role in the curative treatment of early-stage FL; however, its role in the management of stage III disease remains undefined. Methods: In this open-label, multicenter, randomized clinical trial, patients with stage III FL, who demonstrated complete or partial response without bulky after induction immunochemotherapy were enrolled. Eligible patients randomly assigned (1:1) to receive invasive field consolidation radiotherapy (IFRT) combined rituximab maintenance (IFRT+R arm) or rituximab maintenance alone (R arm). The dose of IFRT was 30Gy. The primary endpoint was 5-year progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoint was 5-year overall survival (OS). This study is registered with Chinese ClinicalTrials.gov, number ChiCTR2000032550. Results: Between January 2015 to January 2021, 152 eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive IFRT+R (n=74) or R alone (n=78). Baseline characteristics showed no significant differences between the two arms. After a median follow-up of 82 months, the 5-year PFS was 88.9% in IFRT+R group and 66.7% in R alone group (HR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.16-0.66, P = 0.002). The 5-year OS was 97.3% in IFRT+R group versus 84.4% in R group (HR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.07-0.81, P = 0.02). Treatment-related adverse events were more frequent in the IFRT+R arm than in the R arm (58% vs 38%), predominantly consisting of acute hematologic toxicities, including neutropenia (33% vs 26%) and leukopenia (34% vs 28%). Grade 3-4 toxicities were more common in the IFRT+R arm (27% vs 18%), and no treatment-related deaths were observed. Conclusions: Involved-field radiotherapy after effective systemic therapy significantly improved PFS and OS with manageable toxicity, highlighting its potential role in the management of stage III FL. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR2000032550.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.7054
Primary Topic
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Invasive-field radiotherapy plus rituximab versus rituximab alone after response to immunochemotherapy in stage III follicular lymphoma: An open-label, multicenter, randomized clinical study.

X.C. Li, Huangming Hong, Liling Zhang, Ke Xie et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Invasive-field radiotherapy plus rituximab versus rituximab alone after response to immunochemotherapy in stage III follicular lymphoma: An open-label, multicenter, randomized clinical study.

X.C. Li, Huangming Hong, Liling Zhang, Ke Xie, H. Guo, Tongyu Lin, Liqun Zou, He Huang, Zegeng Chen
article en

Abstract

7054 Background: Stage III follicular lymphoma (FL) remains incurable with immunochemotherapy followed by rituximab maintenance. Radiotherapy plays a critical role in the curative treatment of early-stage FL; however, its role in the management of stage III disease remains undefined. Methods: In this open-label, multicenter, randomized clinical trial, patients with stage III FL, who demonstrated complete or partial response without bulky after induction immunochemotherapy were enrolled. Eligible patients randomly assigned (1:1) to receive invasive field consolidation radiotherapy (IFRT) combined rituximab maintenance (IFRT+R arm) or rituximab maintenance alone (R arm). The dose of IFRT was 30Gy. The primary endpoint was 5-year progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoint was 5-year overall survival (OS). This study is registered with Chinese ClinicalTrials.gov, number ChiCTR2000032550. Results: Between January 2015 to January 2021, 152 eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive IFRT+R (n=74) or R alone (n=78). Baseline characteristics showed no significant differences between the two arms. After a median follow-up of 82 months, the 5-year PFS was 88.9% in IFRT+R group and 66.7% in R alone group (HR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.16-0.66, P = 0.002). The 5-year OS was 97.3% in IFRT+R group versus 84.4% in R group (HR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.07-0.81, P = 0.02). Treatment-related adverse events were more frequent in the IFRT+R arm than in the R arm (58% vs 38%), predominantly consisting of acute hematologic toxicities, including neutropenia (33% vs 26%) and leukopenia (34% vs 28%). Grade 3-4 toxicities were more common in the IFRT+R arm (27% vs 18%), and no treatment-related deaths were observed. Conclusions: Involved-field radiotherapy after effective systemic therapy significantly improved PFS and OS with manageable toxicity, highlighting its potential role in the management of stage III FL. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR2000032550.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
Union Hospital (HK), University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN), Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Sichuan University (CN), West China Hospital of Sichuan University (CN), Shandong Tumor Hospital (CN), Sichuan Cancer Hospital (CN), Sichuan Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN), Henan Cancer Hospital (CN), Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (CN), Shandong First Medical University (CN), Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.