A phase III placebo controlled randomized controlled trial using combination therapy for treatment-related fatigue in patients with prostate cancer.

12005 Background: To determine if the combination of exercise (EX) plus methylphenidate (MP) is superior to EX plus placebo (PL) for 12 weeks in the treatment of cancer-related-fatigue (CRF) in patients with prostate cancer receiving androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and/or radiation therapy (RT). Methods: Using a phase III randomized double-blind placebo-controlled design, we assessed treatments combining either EX or its stretching (ST) control with either MP (5mg twice a day, with dose titrated up to 20mg a day) or placebo. Patients were eligible if they had prostate cancer patients who are receiving androgen deprivation therapy and/or radiation therapy and had CRF; Eligible patients were randomized into one of four arms, EX + MP, EX + PL, ST + MP, ST + PL (2:1:1:1). Primary outcome was assessed using linear mixed-effects model comparing the differences in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) scores at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12. Results: 161 eligible patients were randomly assigned to 4 arms EX+MP (n = 65), EX+PL(n = 34), ST+MP (n = 30), and ST+PL (n = 32). Demographics, including mean age (65-67 years) were similarly distributed between arms (all p > 0.05). Bone metastases (~25%), and treatment modality distributions (ADT alone, ADT + RT, or RT alone) were comparable among the arms. The baseline FACIT-F scores [mean (SD) were 28.5(11.0), 28.7(8.9), 28.5(9.3), and 30.3(11.0)] respectively in arms EX+MP, EX+PL, ST+MP, and ST+PL arms. All 4 arms showed CRF improvement over time. There was a nonsignificant improvement in CRF in the EX+MP intervention arm, compared with EX+PL arm [FACIT-F coefficient, 2.73(95% CI, –0.49 to 5.96); P = 0.097]. Methylphenidate-containing arms (EX+MP and ST+MP) significantly improved CRF compared with their placebo counterparts (EX+PL and ST+PL), [FACIT-F coefficient, 3.23 (95% CI 0.84 to 5.63), P = 0.008]. There were no significant differences in CTCAE v.5 grade ≥3 adverse events by arms (P > 0.99). Conclusions: EX+MP arm was not superior to EX+PL arm in improvement of CRF. Methylphenidate-containing arms significantly improved CRF compared with their placebo arms. All four treatment arms showed improvement of CRF overtime suggesting strong placebo response. Further methylphenidate-containing multimodal CRF studies are needed. Clinical trial information: NCT03772834 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.12005
Primary Topic
Cancer survivorship and care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A phase III placebo controlled randomized controlled trial using combination therapy for treatment-related fatigue in patients with prostate cancer.

Bilal Ahmed Siddiqui, Mary E. Cavanaugh, Sumit Kumar Subudhi, Patrick Glen Pilie et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Cancer survivorship and care
article

A phase III placebo controlled randomized controlled trial using combination therapy for treatment-related fatigue in patients with prostate cancer.

Bilal Ahmed Siddiqui, Mary E. Cavanaugh, Sumit Kumar Subudhi, Patrick Glen Pilie, Penny Stanton, Amado J. Zurita, Paul Gettys Corn, Minxing Chen, Sean Eric McGuire, Quynh Nguyen, Ana Aparicio, Sriram Yennu, Chad Tang, Premjit Roy, Carol Harrison, Karen Basen-Engquist, Lisa Thomas, Seungtaek Choi, Sanjay Shete, Eduardo Bruera
article en

Abstract

12005 Background: To determine if the combination of exercise (EX) plus methylphenidate (MP) is superior to EX plus placebo (PL) for 12 weeks in the treatment of cancer-related-fatigue (CRF) in patients with prostate cancer receiving androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and/or radiation therapy (RT). Methods: Using a phase III randomized double-blind placebo-controlled design, we assessed treatments combining either EX or its stretching (ST) control with either MP (5mg twice a day, with dose titrated up to 20mg a day) or placebo. Patients were eligible if they had prostate cancer patients who are receiving androgen deprivation therapy and/or radiation therapy and had CRF; Eligible patients were randomized into one of four arms, EX + MP, EX + PL, ST + MP, ST + PL (2:1:1:1). Primary outcome was assessed using linear mixed-effects model comparing the differences in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) scores at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12. Results: 161 eligible patients were randomly assigned to 4 arms EX+MP (n = 65), EX+PL(n = 34), ST+MP (n = 30), and ST+PL (n = 32). Demographics, including mean age (65-67 years) were similarly distributed between arms (all p > 0.05). Bone metastases (~25%), and treatment modality distributions (ADT alone, ADT + RT, or RT alone) were comparable among the arms. The baseline FACIT-F scores [mean (SD) were 28.5(11.0), 28.7(8.9), 28.5(9.3), and 30.3(11.0)] respectively in arms EX+MP, EX+PL, ST+MP, and ST+PL arms. All 4 arms showed CRF improvement over time. There was a nonsignificant improvement in CRF in the EX+MP intervention arm, compared with EX+PL arm [FACIT-F coefficient, 2.73(95% CI, –0.49 to 5.96); P = 0.097]. Methylphenidate-containing arms (EX+MP and ST+MP) significantly improved CRF compared with their placebo counterparts (EX+PL and ST+PL), [FACIT-F coefficient, 3.23 (95% CI 0.84 to 5.63), P = 0.008]. There were no significant differences in CTCAE v.5 grade ≥3 adverse events by arms (P > 0.99). Conclusions: EX+MP arm was not superior to EX+PL arm in improvement of CRF. Methylphenidate-containing arms significantly improved CRF compared with their placebo arms. All four treatment arms showed improvement of CRF overtime suggesting strong placebo response. Further methylphenidate-containing multimodal CRF studies are needed. Clinical trial information: NCT03772834 .

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Cancer survivorship and care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.