Clinical impact of wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) in carpal tunnel release: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND: Wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) is increasingly used in carpal tunnel release (CTR) because it avoids tourniquet-related discomfort and allows active intraoperative testing. Although WALANT improves perioperative experience, its effects on postoperative pain and functional recovery remain incompletely defined. Existing meta-analyses are limited by nonrandomized designs and heterogeneous hand procedures. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing WALANT with tourniquet-based anesthetic techniques for CTR. Outcomes included operative time, intraoperative pain, early postoperative pain, patient satisfaction, adverse events, and functional outcomes assessed using the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ). Random-effects models with prespecified subgroup and sensitivity analyses were applied. RESULTS: Eight RCTs were included. Operative time did not differ between WALANT and comparator techniques overall, although operative time was longer with WALANT in open procedures. WALANT was consistently associated with lower intraoperative pain. Early postoperative pain showed substantial heterogeneity across studies, with smaller differences observed in endoscopic procedures. Overall patient satisfaction was higher with WALANT. Adverse events were uncommon and comparable between groups. Functional outcomes were reported in two trials; pooled analysis demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in the BCTQ Functional Status Scale favoring WALANT (mean difference [MD] - 1.17), while no difference was observed in the Symptom Severity Scale. CONCLUSIONS: Based on RCTs, WALANT for carpal tunnel release is associated with lower intraoperative pain and higher overall patient satisfaction. Early postoperative pain was lower with WALANT, although findings were heterogeneous across studies. WALANT may also be associated with improved postoperative hand function. Future randomized studies should systematically report operative and tourniquet duration and incorporate standardized functional outcome measures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-026-06974-2
Primary Topic
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical impact of wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) in carpal tunnel release: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Chi‐Sheng Chien, Chia-You Chou, Wei-Ting Lin, Yu-Jung Su
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
article

Clinical impact of wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) in carpal tunnel release: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Chi‐Sheng Chien, Chia-You Chou, Wei-Ting Lin, Yu-Jung Su
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) is increasingly used in carpal tunnel release (CTR) because it avoids tourniquet-related discomfort and allows active intraoperative testing. Although WALANT improves perioperative experience, its effects on postoperative pain and functional recovery remain incompletely defined. Existing meta-analyses are limited by nonrandomized designs and heterogeneous hand procedures. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing WALANT with tourniquet-based anesthetic techniques for CTR. Outcomes included operative time, intraoperative pain, early postoperative pain, patient satisfaction, adverse events, and functional outcomes assessed using the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ). Random-effects models with prespecified subgroup and sensitivity analyses were applied. RESULTS: Eight RCTs were included. Operative time did not differ between WALANT and comparator techniques overall, although operative time was longer with WALANT in open procedures. WALANT was consistently associated with lower intraoperative pain. Early postoperative pain showed substantial heterogeneity across studies, with smaller differences observed in endoscopic procedures. Overall patient satisfaction was higher with WALANT. Adverse events were uncommon and comparable between groups. Functional outcomes were reported in two trials; pooled analysis demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in the BCTQ Functional Status Scale favoring WALANT (mean difference [MD] - 1.17), while no difference was observed in the Symptom Severity Scale. CONCLUSIONS: Based on RCTs, WALANT for carpal tunnel release is associated with lower intraoperative pain and higher overall patient satisfaction. Early postoperative pain was lower with WALANT, although findings were heterogeneous across studies. WALANT may also be associated with improved postoperative hand function. Future randomized studies should systematically report operative and tourniquet duration and incorporate standardized functional outcome measures.

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
National Sun Yat-sen University (TW), Chi Mei Medical Center (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.