Academic collaborations and public health: Lessons from Dutch universities’ tobacco industry partnerships for fossil fuel ties

Tobacco and fossil fuels are both leading commercial determinants of health and both industries actively obstruct health and environmental policy, yet academic collaboration with these industries is treated differently. While the WHO and many academics recognise an “ irreconcilable conflict ” between the tobacco industry and public health interests, many universities justify fossil fuel collaborations if linked to the energy transition. This essay draws lessons from the history of tobacco industry collaborations in the Netherlands to inform current debates on fossil fuel ties in academia. We examine the evolving policies and attitudes toward tobacco in the Netherlands, the industry’s historical and ongoing influence on academia, and parallels with fossil fuel strategies such as casting doubt on health risks, leveraging industry-funded research, shifting blame, and emphasising consumer responsibility and economic importance. Finally, we discuss how the academic world—universities, research funders, journals, and medical professionals—should critically assess their engagement with tobacco and fossil fuel industries.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Climate
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000867
Primary Topic
Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Academic collaborations and public health: Lessons from Dutch universities’ tobacco industry partnerships for fossil fuel ties

Linda Knoester, Andrew Littlejohn, Andrea Reyes Elizondo, Aaron Pereira et al.
PLOS Climate
Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
article

Academic collaborations and public health: Lessons from Dutch universities’ tobacco industry partnerships for fossil fuel ties

Linda Knoester, Andrew Littlejohn, Andrea Reyes Elizondo, Aaron Pereira, Anne E. Urai, Lynn Vanheule
article en

Abstract

Tobacco and fossil fuels are both leading commercial determinants of health and both industries actively obstruct health and environmental policy, yet academic collaboration with these industries is treated differently. While the WHO and many academics recognise an “ irreconcilable conflict ” between the tobacco industry and public health interests, many universities justify fossil fuel collaborations if linked to the energy transition. This essay draws lessons from the history of tobacco industry collaborations in the Netherlands to inform current debates on fossil fuel ties in academia. We examine the evolving policies and attitudes toward tobacco in the Netherlands, the industry’s historical and ongoing influence on academia, and parallels with fossil fuel strategies such as casting doubt on health risks, leveraging industry-funded research, shifting blame, and emphasising consumer responsibility and economic importance. Finally, we discuss how the academic world—universities, research funders, journals, and medical professionals—should critically assess their engagement with tobacco and fossil fuel industries.

PLOS ClimateVol. 5(5)
Universiteit Leiden
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.