Patient-Reported Outcomes After Distal Radius Fractures Differ Across Geographic and Cultural Populations: A Global Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES: To assess patient reported outcome (PRO) heterogeneity across different cultural and geographical regions via a systematic review and meta-analysis of PROs following volar plate fixation of distal radius fractures. METHODS: Data Sources: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were queried for randomized controlled trials from 2010 to 2023 reporting Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), QuickDASH, Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), or Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) PROs. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized controlled trials with treatment arms consisting of open reduction and internal fixation utilizing a volar locking plate for adult distal radius fracture (OTA/AO 23) and reported DASH, QuickDASH, PRWE, or VAS PROs were included. Studies not published in English or that provided insufficient extraction data were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION: Studies were characterized by country of origin, continent of origin, and cultural region of origin. Extracted data included PRO outcomes, patient demographics, and follow-up ranges. DATA SYNTHESIS: Random-effects meta-analysis was performed with Restricted Maximum Likelihood method, and subgroup analyses were performed to determine differences in pooled PROs across geographical and cultural regions. RESULTS: 52 treatment arms met inclusion criteria for DASH analysis, 33 for PRWE, and 23 for VAS. Significant mean DASH score heterogeneity existed across all studies (p<0.01). Nine cultural regions were represented in the DASH analysis and demonstrated significantly different pooled mean PRO scores (p<0.01). Significant mean PRWE score heterogeneity existed across all studies (p<0.01). Seven cultural regions were represented in the PRWE analysis and demonstrated significantly different pooled mean PRO scores (p<0.01). Significant mean VAS score heterogeneity existed across all studies (p<0.01). Eight cultural regions were represented in the VAS analysis and demonstrated significantly different pooled mean PRO scores (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Patient reported outcomes following distal radius volar plate fixation demonstrated meaningful variation across cultural and geographic contexts. Outcomes from one cultural region may not be globally generalizable. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, Level I.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/bot.0000000000003228
Primary Topic
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patient-Reported Outcomes After Distal Radius Fractures Differ Across Geographic and Cultural Populations: A Global Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Yousi A. Oquendo, Alona Katzir, Heather S. Haeberle, Craig E. Klinger et al.
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
article

Patient-Reported Outcomes After Distal Radius Fractures Differ Across Geographic and Cultural Populations: A Global Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Yousi A. Oquendo, Alona Katzir, Heather S. Haeberle, Craig E. Klinger, Aleksey Dvorzhinskiy, William M. Ricci, Robert E. Bilodeau, Rishabh S. Bhadouriya, Kathryn A. Barth, Lauren Victory, Jelle P. van der List, MSA
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess patient reported outcome (PRO) heterogeneity across different cultural and geographical regions via a systematic review and meta-analysis of PROs following volar plate fixation of distal radius fractures. METHODS: Data Sources: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were queried for randomized controlled trials from 2010 to 2023 reporting Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), QuickDASH, Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), or Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) PROs. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized controlled trials with treatment arms consisting of open reduction and internal fixation utilizing a volar locking plate for adult distal radius fracture (OTA/AO 23) and reported DASH, QuickDASH, PRWE, or VAS PROs were included. Studies not published in English or that provided insufficient extraction data were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION: Studies were characterized by country of origin, continent of origin, and cultural region of origin. Extracted data included PRO outcomes, patient demographics, and follow-up ranges. DATA SYNTHESIS: Random-effects meta-analysis was performed with Restricted Maximum Likelihood method, and subgroup analyses were performed to determine differences in pooled PROs across geographical and cultural regions. RESULTS: 52 treatment arms met inclusion criteria for DASH analysis, 33 for PRWE, and 23 for VAS. Significant mean DASH score heterogeneity existed across all studies (p<0.01). Nine cultural regions were represented in the DASH analysis and demonstrated significantly different pooled mean PRO scores (p<0.01). Significant mean PRWE score heterogeneity existed across all studies (p<0.01). Seven cultural regions were represented in the PRWE analysis and demonstrated significantly different pooled mean PRO scores (p<0.01). Significant mean VAS score heterogeneity existed across all studies (p<0.01). Eight cultural regions were represented in the VAS analysis and demonstrated significantly different pooled mean PRO scores (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Patient reported outcomes following distal radius volar plate fixation demonstrated meaningful variation across cultural and geographic contexts. Outcomes from one cultural region may not be globally generalizable. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, Level I.

Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
Hospital for Special Surgery (US), University of Pittsburgh (US), The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.