Racial disparities in endometrial cancer (EC) survival after molecular classification (MC).

5620 Background: Black (BAA) patients with EC have double the mortality rate compared to White patients. It is unclear if these survival differences persist after MC. Here, we examine racial disparities in this context and seek to identify molecular differences by race. Methods: EC samples (n = 10,162: BAA n=2,410, White n=7,752) were analyzed by NGS (NextSeq/NovaSeq) and RNA (NovaSeq) (Caris Life Sciences, Phx, AZ). Four well-described EC groups were created: POLE ultramutated (POLE-mt), MSI-H, TP53-mt, or No Specific Molecular Profile (NSMP; TP53-wt). Overall survival (OS) was obtained from insurance claims and calculated from tissue collection to last contact for MC cohorts. Hazard ratio (HR) was calculated by Cox proportional hazards, with p-value calculated by log-rank test. Race was self-reported. Results: There was a higher prevalence of BAA patients in the TP53-mt subtype (69.1% vs. 43%), compared with POLE-mt (1% vs. 2.26%) and NSMP (16.4% vs. 31%) (p<0.001). Across EC, BAA patients had shorter OS (29.8 vs 39.7 months (m); HR: 1.30 (1.22-1.39), p<0.001). BAA patients had worse OS in the NSMP cohort (36.8 vs 49.5m; HR 1.35 (1.15-1.59), p<0.001) and TP53-mt cohort (26.1 vs 29.6 m; HR 1.13 (1.05-1.22), p=0.002). Race was not associated with differences in OS in POLE-mt (NR vs was 51.4 m) and MSI-H (44.4 vs 45.9 m). There were molecular differences between race when stratified by MC (q<0.05) (Table 1). Gene set enrichment analysis showed downregulation of immune-related pathways in BAA. In NSMP tumors, BAA patients had lower IFNγ signature (0.72-fc) and worse post-pembrolizumab survival (16.9 vs 24.6 m; HR 1.46 (1.09-1.95), p=0.011). Conclusions: Previous studies demonstrated that racial disparities in endometrial cancer persist even when controlling for histology. This study demonstrates that these disparities persist even after controlling for MC, as defined by the ProMisE classification. BAA patients were more likely to develop TP53-mt tumors, but the survival disparity was largest in the NSMP group. Furthermore, Black and White patients exhibit differential expression of known prognostic mutations even within the same MC group. Molecular differences by race and subtype. Biomarker TP53-mt NSMP BAA % White % BAA % White % ARID1A -mt 4.47 10.3 32.8 48.9 CTNNB1 -mt NS NS 31.1 40.2 FGFR2 -mt 0.60 2.94 3.29 11.3 PIK3CA -mt 23.1 36.6 NS NS PIK3R1 -mt 9.58 15.4 17.9 35.0 PTEN -mt 6.83 15.7 40.4 66.9 PPP2R1A-mt 15.5 23.8 NS NS CDKN2A -del NS NS 22.0 13.7

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.5620
Primary Topic
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Racial disparities in endometrial cancer (EC) survival after molecular classification (MC).

Ninad Kulkarni, Jill Roberts, Wafa Khadraoui, Navya Nair et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
article

Racial disparities in endometrial cancer (EC) survival after molecular classification (MC).

Ninad Kulkarni, Jill Roberts, Wafa Khadraoui, Navya Nair, Michael Toboni, Abdulrahman Sinno, Britt Kristina Erickson, Sharon Wu, Matthew James Oberley
article en

Abstract

5620 Background: Black (BAA) patients with EC have double the mortality rate compared to White patients. It is unclear if these survival differences persist after MC. Here, we examine racial disparities in this context and seek to identify molecular differences by race. Methods: EC samples (n = 10,162: BAA n=2,410, White n=7,752) were analyzed by NGS (NextSeq/NovaSeq) and RNA (NovaSeq) (Caris Life Sciences, Phx, AZ). Four well-described EC groups were created: POLE ultramutated (POLE-mt), MSI-H, TP53-mt, or No Specific Molecular Profile (NSMP; TP53-wt). Overall survival (OS) was obtained from insurance claims and calculated from tissue collection to last contact for MC cohorts. Hazard ratio (HR) was calculated by Cox proportional hazards, with p-value calculated by log-rank test. Race was self-reported. Results: There was a higher prevalence of BAA patients in the TP53-mt subtype (69.1% vs. 43%), compared with POLE-mt (1% vs. 2.26%) and NSMP (16.4% vs. 31%) (p<0.001). Across EC, BAA patients had shorter OS (29.8 vs 39.7 months (m); HR: 1.30 (1.22-1.39), p<0.001). BAA patients had worse OS in the NSMP cohort (36.8 vs 49.5m; HR 1.35 (1.15-1.59), p<0.001) and TP53-mt cohort (26.1 vs 29.6 m; HR 1.13 (1.05-1.22), p=0.002). Race was not associated with differences in OS in POLE-mt (NR vs was 51.4 m) and MSI-H (44.4 vs 45.9 m). There were molecular differences between race when stratified by MC (q<0.05) (Table 1). Gene set enrichment analysis showed downregulation of immune-related pathways in BAA. In NSMP tumors, BAA patients had lower IFNγ signature (0.72-fc) and worse post-pembrolizumab survival (16.9 vs 24.6 m; HR 1.46 (1.09-1.95), p=0.011). Conclusions: Previous studies demonstrated that racial disparities in endometrial cancer persist even when controlling for histology. This study demonstrates that these disparities persist even after controlling for MC, as defined by the ProMisE classification. BAA patients were more likely to develop TP53-mt tumors, but the survival disparity was largest in the NSMP group. Furthermore, Black and White patients exhibit differential expression of known prognostic mutations even within the same MC group. Molecular differences by race and subtype. Biomarker TP53-mt NSMP BAA % White % BAA % White % ARID1A -mt 4.47 10.3 32.8 48.9 CTNNB1 -mt NS NS 31.1 40.2 FGFR2 -mt 0.60 2.94 3.29 11.3 PIK3CA -mt 23.1 36.6 NS NS PIK3R1 -mt 9.58 15.4 17.9 35.0 PTEN -mt 6.83 15.7 40.4 66.9 PPP2R1A-mt 15.5 23.8 NS NS CDKN2A -del NS NS 22.0 13.7

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
University of Minnesota (US), University of Miami (US), University of Alabama at Birmingham (US), Caris Life Sciences (United States) (US), Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.