What Hines v Pardue and Chiles v Salazar mean for your veterinary practice—and what they don’t: a plain-language guide for veterinary professionals

"What Hines v Pardue and Chiles v Salazar mean for your veterinary practice—and what they don’t: a plain-language guide for veterinary professionals" published on 27 May 2026 by American Veterinary Medical Association.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.264.7.833
Primary Topic
Criminal Law and Evidence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What Hines v Pardue and Chiles v Salazar mean for your veterinary practice—and what they don’t: a plain-language guide for veterinary professionals

Philip S. Goldberg
Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association
Criminal Law and Evidence
article

What Hines v Pardue and Chiles v Salazar mean for your veterinary practice—and what they don’t: a plain-language guide for veterinary professionals

Philip S. Goldberg
article en

Abstract

No abstract available for this paper.

Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association
Shook, Hardy & Bacon (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Criminal Law and Evidence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.