Quantitative Reliability of μ-FTIR-Based Microplastic Analysis: Effects of Filtration, Rinsing, and Software Calibration

Methodological variability remains a major source of uncertainty in environmental microplastics (MPs) analysis, particularly for micro-Fourier transform infrared (μ-FTIR) spectroscopy operated in reflection mode. This study quantitatively evaluates how key analytical procedures influence recovery efficiency and identification performance in μ-FTIR-based MPs analysis. Polystyrene (PS) standard particles (90 μm and 30 μm; density 1.05 g/cm3) were employed in direct titration and standard addition experiments. The effects of filter materials, rinsing suspensions, filtration approaches, and identification protocols were systematically assessed. Under the tested reflection-mode μ-FTIR conditions, silicon and stainless-steel filters provided sufficient spectral readability and microscopic particle visibility for PS particle recognition and were therefore selected for subsequent recovery evaluation. Rinsing with 50% ethanol reduced aggregation and enhanced recovery. Pump-assisted filtration (200 mmHg) achieved high PS recovery (88 ± 7.25%), and standard addition in river samples reached 91 ± 14.5%. Manual calibration using reference standards further improved classification consistency. These findings quantitatively link procedural choices to recovery and identification outcomes, providing practical guidance to improve reliability and inter-study comparability in μ-FTIR-based MPs analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app16115362
Primary Topic
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantitative Reliability of μ-FTIR-Based Microplastic Analysis: Effects of Filtration, Rinsing, and Software Calibration

Po‐Wen Chen, Tzu-Heng Su, Tzu-Yun Chang, Zhen-Shu Liu
Applied Sciences
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
article

Quantitative Reliability of μ-FTIR-Based Microplastic Analysis: Effects of Filtration, Rinsing, and Software Calibration

Po‐Wen Chen, Tzu-Heng Su, Tzu-Yun Chang, Zhen-Shu Liu
article en

Abstract

Methodological variability remains a major source of uncertainty in environmental microplastics (MPs) analysis, particularly for micro-Fourier transform infrared (μ-FTIR) spectroscopy operated in reflection mode. This study quantitatively evaluates how key analytical procedures influence recovery efficiency and identification performance in μ-FTIR-based MPs analysis. Polystyrene (PS) standard particles (90 μm and 30 μm; density 1.05 g/cm3) were employed in direct titration and standard addition experiments. The effects of filter materials, rinsing suspensions, filtration approaches, and identification protocols were systematically assessed. Under the tested reflection-mode μ-FTIR conditions, silicon and stainless-steel filters provided sufficient spectral readability and microscopic particle visibility for PS particle recognition and were therefore selected for subsequent recovery evaluation. Rinsing with 50% ethanol reduced aggregation and enhanced recovery. Pump-assisted filtration (200 mmHg) achieved high PS recovery (88 ± 7.25%), and standard addition in river samples reached 91 ± 14.5%. Manual calibration using reference standards further improved classification consistency. These findings quantitatively link procedural choices to recovery and identification outcomes, providing practical guidance to improve reliability and inter-study comparability in μ-FTIR-based MPs analysis.

Applied SciencesVol. 16(11)
Ming Chi University of Technology (TW), Chang Gung University of Science and Technology (TW), National Chung Hsing University (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.