The Technopolitical Paradox: Navigating Algorithmic Legitimacy, Participation Facades, and Technocratic Inclusion in Post‐Reformasi Indonesia

ABSTRACT Digital governance in transitional democracies promises enhanced participation but often produces new forms of exclusion. This study examines the “technopolitical paradox” in post‐Reformasi Indonesia, where algorithmic systems expand engagement while reinforcing elite control. Introducing a novel framework of algorithmic legitimacy, participation facades, and technocratic inclusion, the research analyzes how digital technologies reshape political authority. Based on mixed‐methods data, policy analysis, 45 interviews, digital ethnography, and a survey ( n = 1247), the findings reveal that data‐driven claims obscure political choices, participatory platforms simulate engagement without influence, and technical requirements systematically marginalize non‐expert citizens. The study concludes that digital governance risks reproducing inequality behind a meritocratic facade, challenging democratic values in the digital age.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Policy & Internet
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.70044
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Technopolitical Paradox: Navigating Algorithmic Legitimacy, Participation Facades, and Technocratic Inclusion in Post‐Reformasi Indonesia

Isnaini Muallidin, Hadi Supratikta
Policy & Internet
Social Media and Politics
article

The Technopolitical Paradox: Navigating Algorithmic Legitimacy, Participation Facades, and Technocratic Inclusion in Post‐Reformasi Indonesia

Isnaini Muallidin, Hadi Supratikta
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Digital governance in transitional democracies promises enhanced participation but often produces new forms of exclusion. This study examines the “technopolitical paradox” in post‐Reformasi Indonesia, where algorithmic systems expand engagement while reinforcing elite control. Introducing a novel framework of algorithmic legitimacy, participation facades, and technocratic inclusion, the research analyzes how digital technologies reshape political authority. Based on mixed‐methods data, policy analysis, 45 interviews, digital ethnography, and a survey ( n = 1247), the findings reveal that data‐driven claims obscure political choices, participatory platforms simulate engagement without influence, and technical requirements systematically marginalize non‐expert citizens. The study concludes that digital governance risks reproducing inequality behind a meritocratic facade, challenging democratic values in the digital age.

Policy & InternetVol. 18(2)
Muhammadiyah University of Yogyakarta (ID), National Research and Innovation Agency (ID), Nasional University (ID)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Social Media and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.