First results from the OPTIMA phase III randomized non-inferiority trial of test-directed chemotherapy in patients with high clinical risk ER-positive HER2-negative early breast cancer.
500 Background: Tumor gene expression tests are widely used to assist adjuvant chemotherapy decisions for women with early breast cancer (EBC). OPTIMA (Optimal Personalised Treatment of early breast cancer using Multi-parameter Analysis) is an international RCT comparing chemotherapy decisions made with the Prosigna (PAM50) gene expression test with standard treatment in mostly node-positive patients. Methods: Women and men aged >40 recommended to receive chemotherapy for ER+ HER2- EBC with 0-9 involved axillary nodes and T size >30mm if node negative were eligible. Randomization was between standard chemotherapy followed by endocrine therapy (CET) or to a Prosigna test directed chemotherapy decision. Patients with Prosigna ROR score > 60 tumors were assigned CET whilst those with low ROR score (≤60) tumors received endocrine therapy (ET) alone. ET for premenopausal women included ovarian function suppression (OFS) in the absence of chemotherapy-induced ovarian insufficiency. ROR scores were not disclosed, and patients receiving CET were blinded to their randomization. OPTIMA was designed to demonstrate non-inferiority (NI) of 5-year invasive breast cancer free survival (IBCFS) in the test-directed arm with a 3% margin in the per protocol (PP) population using a 5% 1-sided alpha. Control arm testing allowed treatment comparison within the low ROR score population at a 3.5% NI margin. Results: From 16 th Jan 2017 to 12 th Dec 2025 4429 patients were randomized, 2215 to the control arm and 2214 to the test-directed arm of whom 2061 (93%) and 2097 (95%) were included in the respective PP group. Patient characteristics in the PP population were well-balanced; 62% were postmenopausal, 37% premenopausal and 0.8% male. 73% had pN1/pN1sn, 8% had pN0/pN1mi and 19% had pN2 tumors. 68% had low ROR score tumors. With a median follow-up of 3.9 years (interquartile range 2.0-5.9), 280 IBCFS events occurred (141 on control arm; 139 on test directed arm) of which 66% were distant recurrences. The 5-year IBCFS rate in the control arm was 91.5% [95% CI 89.7- 92.9%] and 90.4% [95% CI 88.6- 92.0%] in the test-directed arm, Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.99 [90% CI 0.81- 1.20], NI p = 0.013, thereby meeting the pre-defined NI margin. The corresponding 5-year IBCFS rates for the low ROR score population were 94.9% [95% CI 92.9- 96.4%] and 93.7% [95% CI 91.8- 95.2%] for the two arms respectively, HR 1.06 [90% CI 0.78- 1.46] NI p = 0.0051 again demonstrating non-inferiority. There was no significant outcome heterogeneity between subgroups including for menopausal and nodal status. Conclusions: The OPTIMA trial demonstrates that women and men with ER+ HER2- EBC and ROR score ≤60 tumors can safely avoid chemotherapy. It provides evidence for the utility of test-directed chemotherapy in premenopausal women treated with OFS and patients with high levels of nodal involvement. Clinical trial information: ISRCTN42400492.
Authors
- Bjørn Naume (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6811-9476)
- David Cameron (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2717-7979)
- Belinda E. Kiely (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1662-3523)
- Robert C. Stein (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2969-0415)
- Carmel Conefrey (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4384-6369)
- Andreas Makris (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2003-1088)
- Daniel Rea (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7301-4030)
- Iain R. Macpherson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4295-8885)
- Luke Hughes‐Davies (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2698-818X)
- Adrienne Morgan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4400-827X)
- Sarah E Pinder
- Karen J. Taylor (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2265-5097)
- John M.S. Bartlett (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0347-3888)
- Stuart McIntosh
- P Hall
- Janet Dunn
- Abeer Shaaban
- OPTIMA Investigators and Trial Management Group
- Helena Margaret Earl
- Andrea Marshall
- Mary Rose Falzon
Institutions
- Queen's University Belfast (GB)
- Oslo University Hospital (NO)
- Camden and Campbelltown Hospitals (AU)
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- King's College London (GB)
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham (GB)
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- Edinburgh Cancer Research (GB)
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (GB)
- University of Bristol (GB)
- University of Warwick (GB)
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre (GB)
- The Patients Association (GB)
- University College London (GB)
- University of Glasgow (GB)
- University of Birmingham (GB)
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2026-05-27
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.500
- Primary Topic
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Kreftforeningen
- Veracyte
- Breast Cancer Trials
- Nasjonalt program for klinisk behandlingsforskning i spesialisthelsetjenesten