Comparative Analysis of Lepidopteran Community Structure Using DNA Metabarcoding: Warm‐Temperate Forest Versus Grass‐Shrub Ecotones in Pangquangou National Nature Reserve

ABSTRACT Lepidoptera is a widely geographically distributed insect order that plays crucial ecological roles in forest and grass‐shrub ecosystems as both pollinators and herbivores. This study compared Lepidoptera species composition and diversity between semi‐arid forest and grass‐shrub ecosystems in northern China's Pangquangou National Nature Reserve to provide scientific insights for biodiversity conservation and pest management. Nine representative plots (five forest and four grass‐shrub) were established, and Lepidoptera communities were analyzed using an integrated approach combining DNA metabarcoding, DNA barcoding, and classical morphological methods. A total of 2944 individuals were collected, representing 453 species from 80 genera and 31 families, with an 82% cross‐method species identification match. Despite being more time‐consuming, metabarcoding offers a clear advantage for large‐scale biodiversity monitoring due to its extremely low per‐sample cost (up to 79.2% of costs saved compared to traditional morphological methods and 87.3% of costs saved compared to DNA barcoding). However, morphological validation remains necessary to ensure accurate identification. Dominant families showed higher relative abundance in forests (85.07%) than in grass‐shrub areas (75.18%). Alpha diversity, assessed via the Shannon‐Wiener index, exhibited no significant difference between ecosystems ( p = 0.72). Beta diversity analysis also indicated comparable community compositions, though differences were not statistically significant ( p = 0.332). Five dominant families (Noctuidae, Notodontidae, Geometridae, Erebidae, and Nymphalidae) were shared between ecosystems, while Lasiocampidae occurred exclusively in forests. Notably, metabarcoding data accurately reflected species composition and abundance, facilitated precise prediction of caterpillar pest outbreaks, and supported targeted control measures. This study confirms that DNA metabarcoding, when supplemented with morphological verification, is a robust tool for Lepidoptera biodiversity assessment. Our findings provide reliable solutions for ecosystem monitoring and pest management, underscoring the method's potential for large‐scale biodiversity studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecology and Evolution
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.73738
Primary Topic
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Lepidopteran Community Structure Using DNA Metabarcoding: Warm‐Temperate Forest Versus Grass‐Shrub Ecotones in Pangquangou National Nature Reserve

Angie Deng, Xinrun Ren, Shiyi Lian, Ziyu Huang et al.
Ecology and Evolution
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
article

Comparative Analysis of Lepidopteran Community Structure Using DNA Metabarcoding: Warm‐Temperate Forest Versus Grass‐Shrub Ecotones in Pangquangou National Nature Reserve

Angie Deng, Xinrun Ren, Shiyi Lian, Ziyu Huang, Huimin Yao, Lina Men, Yali Li, Ling Wu, Min Li, Zhiwei Zhang
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Lepidoptera is a widely geographically distributed insect order that plays crucial ecological roles in forest and grass‐shrub ecosystems as both pollinators and herbivores. This study compared Lepidoptera species composition and diversity between semi‐arid forest and grass‐shrub ecosystems in northern China's Pangquangou National Nature Reserve to provide scientific insights for biodiversity conservation and pest management. Nine representative plots (five forest and four grass‐shrub) were established, and Lepidoptera communities were analyzed using an integrated approach combining DNA metabarcoding, DNA barcoding, and classical morphological methods. A total of 2944 individuals were collected, representing 453 species from 80 genera and 31 families, with an 82% cross‐method species identification match. Despite being more time‐consuming, metabarcoding offers a clear advantage for large‐scale biodiversity monitoring due to its extremely low per‐sample cost (up to 79.2% of costs saved compared to traditional morphological methods and 87.3% of costs saved compared to DNA barcoding). However, morphological validation remains necessary to ensure accurate identification. Dominant families showed higher relative abundance in forests (85.07%) than in grass‐shrub areas (75.18%). Alpha diversity, assessed via the Shannon‐Wiener index, exhibited no significant difference between ecosystems ( p = 0.72). Beta diversity analysis also indicated comparable community compositions, though differences were not statistically significant ( p = 0.332). Five dominant families (Noctuidae, Notodontidae, Geometridae, Erebidae, and Nymphalidae) were shared between ecosystems, while Lasiocampidae occurred exclusively in forests. Notably, metabarcoding data accurately reflected species composition and abundance, facilitated precise prediction of caterpillar pest outbreaks, and supported targeted control measures. This study confirms that DNA metabarcoding, when supplemented with morphological verification, is a robust tool for Lepidoptera biodiversity assessment. Our findings provide reliable solutions for ecosystem monitoring and pest management, underscoring the method's potential for large‐scale biodiversity studies.

Ecology and EvolutionVol. 16(6)
Shanxi Agricultural University (CN), Lucile Packard Children's Hospital (US), Taiyuan Normal University (CN), Shanxi Academy of Forestry (CN), State Forestry and Grassland Administration (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.