IMPLEMENTATION OF RESTORATIVE JUSTICE IN HANDLING CRIMINAL ACTS OF CORRUPTION IN INDONESIA

Corruption is an extraordinary crime that causes significant losses to state finances and undermines public trust in the government. To date, the handling of corruption in Indonesia has focused on a repressive approach through criminal punishment of perpetrators. However, this approach has not been fully effective in optimally recovering state losses. The concept of restorative justice emerges as an approach that emphasizes the restoration of losses, the responsibility of perpetrators, and the balance of interests between the state and society. This study aims to analyze the application of restorative justice in handling corruption in Indonesia and the obstacles to its implementation. The research method used is normative legal research with a statutory and conceptual approach. The results indicate that the application of restorative justice in corruption cases still faces various obstacles, primarily because corruption is categorized as a serious crime with far-reaching impacts. Nevertheless, the approach of recovering state losses through asset return and payment of compensation can be a form of implementing restorative justice principles in corruption.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20406157
Primary Topic
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

IMPLEMENTATION OF RESTORATIVE JUSTICE IN HANDLING CRIMINAL ACTS OF CORRUPTION IN INDONESIA

Henny Saida Flora1*, Bertrand Silverius Sitohang2, Sahata Manalu3
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
article

IMPLEMENTATION OF RESTORATIVE JUSTICE IN HANDLING CRIMINAL ACTS OF CORRUPTION IN INDONESIA

Henny Saida Flora1*, Bertrand Silverius Sitohang2, Sahata Manalu3
article en

Abstract

Corruption is an extraordinary crime that causes significant losses to state finances and undermines public trust in the government. To date, the handling of corruption in Indonesia has focused on a repressive approach through criminal punishment of perpetrators. However, this approach has not been fully effective in optimally recovering state losses. The concept of restorative justice emerges as an approach that emphasizes the restoration of losses, the responsibility of perpetrators, and the balance of interests between the state and society. This study aims to analyze the application of restorative justice in handling corruption in Indonesia and the obstacles to its implementation. The research method used is normative legal research with a statutory and conceptual approach. The results indicate that the application of restorative justice in corruption cases still faces various obstacles, primarily because corruption is categorized as a serious crime with far-reaching impacts. Nevertheless, the approach of recovering state losses through asset return and payment of compensation can be a form of implementing restorative justice principles in corruption.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.