C-POST study of adjuvant cemiplimab for high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC): Disease-free survival (DFS) analyses per high-risk criteria and per start time after radiotherapy.

6083 Background: C-POST, a phase 3 trial (NCT03969004) in patients (pts) with high risk CSCC after surgery and radiotherapy (RT), demonstrated superior disease-free survival (DFS) for adjuvant cemiplimab (cemi) vs placebo (pbo) (HR, 0.32; P <0.0001); treatment discontinuation due to adverse events occurred in 9.8% vs 1.5% of pts (Rischin, et al. N Engl J Med . 2025). With approximately 6 months of additional follow-up, we present exploratory analyses of DFS per high-risk criteria and per the interval between completion of prior RT and study randomization (2-6 wk vs >6 wk). These additional analyses provide key data to understand the importance of risk factors and the impact of time post RT. Methods: Pts were randomized 1:1 (N=415) to adjuvant cemi or pbo (350 mg cemi or pbo Q3W for 12 wk, then 700 mg cemi or pbo Q6W for 36 wk). All pts had nodal high-risk disease (with extracapsular extension [ECE] and ≥1 node ≥20 mm, or ≥3 nodes regardless of ECE) and/or non-nodal high-risk disease (in-transit metastases, perineural invasion, T4 lesions, or recurrent CSCC with ≥1 other feature). Tumors could meet ≥1 high-risk criteria. Randomization occurred within 2-11 wk after completion of RT. Data cutoff was April 7, 2025. Results: Among 415 pts (209/206 cemi/pbo) randomized, the DFS HR was 0.35 (95% CI, 0.23-0.55) at a median follow-up of 30 months. The most common high-risk criterion was nodal ECE, present in 48.4% of pts (201/415). DFS was improved with cemi vs pbo across all high-risk features, including both nodal and non-nodal criteria (Table 1). A consistent benefit was observed regardless of whether the interval between prior RT completion and study randomization was 2-6 wk (DFS events, 17/117 [14.5%] vs 37/112 [33.0%]; HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.22-0.70) or >6 wk (DFS events, 12/91 [13.2%] vs 31/93 [33.3%]; HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.19-0.71). Conclusions: In this phase 3 study, adjuvant cemi demonstrated a DFS benefit vs pbo across all high-risk features and regardless of the interval between prior RT completion and randomization. Clinical trial information: NCT03969004 . DFS with cemi vs pbo: Analyses per high-risk criteria. Criteria a Met high risk criteria, n/N (%) DFS events in cemi arm, n/N (%) DFS events in pbo arm, n/N (%) DFS HR (95% CI) Nodal high risk ECE with ≥1 node ≥20 mm 201/415 (48.4) 14/105 (13.3) 27/96 (28.1) 0.44 (0.23-0.84) ≥3 nodes 71/415 (17.1) 7/34 (20.6) 18/37 (48.6) 0.34 (0.13-0.92) Non-nodal high risk In-transit metastases 41/415 (9.9) 2/20 (10.0) 9/21 (42.9) 0.07 (0.01-0.58) T4 lesion 33/415 (8.0) 6/17 (35.3) 5/16 (31.3) 0.58 (0.16-2.11) Perineural invasion 64/415 (15.4) 3/32 (9.4) 8/32 (25.0) 0.27 (0.07-1.04) Recurrent CSCC with ≥1 additional high-risk criteria 105/415 (25.3) 9/55 (16.4) 22/50 (44.0) 0.19 (0.08-0.45) a Tumors could meet ≥1 high-risk criteria.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.6083
Primary Topic
Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

C-POST study of adjuvant cemiplimab for high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC): Disease-free survival (DFS) analyses per high-risk criteria and per start time after radiotherapy.

Naoya Yamazaki, Frank Seebach, Annette M. Lim, James Estes Jackson et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
article

C-POST study of adjuvant cemiplimab for high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC): Disease-free survival (DFS) analyses per high-risk criteria and per start time after radiotherapy.

Naoya Yamazaki, Frank Seebach, Annette M. Lim, James Estes Jackson, Danny Rischin, B. Stein, Hayden Robert Christie, Matthew G. Fury, Debra AG McIntyre, Samantha Bowyer, Armarnath Challapalli, Rahul Ladwa, Suk-Young Yoo, Axel Hauschild, Paolo Bossi, Priscila Hermont Goncalves, Daniel Brungs, Yungpo Su, Sandro V. Porceddu, Fiona Day
article en

Abstract

6083 Background: C-POST, a phase 3 trial (NCT03969004) in patients (pts) with high risk CSCC after surgery and radiotherapy (RT), demonstrated superior disease-free survival (DFS) for adjuvant cemiplimab (cemi) vs placebo (pbo) (HR, 0.32; P <0.0001); treatment discontinuation due to adverse events occurred in 9.8% vs 1.5% of pts (Rischin, et al. N Engl J Med . 2025). With approximately 6 months of additional follow-up, we present exploratory analyses of DFS per high-risk criteria and per the interval between completion of prior RT and study randomization (2-6 wk vs >6 wk). These additional analyses provide key data to understand the importance of risk factors and the impact of time post RT. Methods: Pts were randomized 1:1 (N=415) to adjuvant cemi or pbo (350 mg cemi or pbo Q3W for 12 wk, then 700 mg cemi or pbo Q6W for 36 wk). All pts had nodal high-risk disease (with extracapsular extension [ECE] and ≥1 node ≥20 mm, or ≥3 nodes regardless of ECE) and/or non-nodal high-risk disease (in-transit metastases, perineural invasion, T4 lesions, or recurrent CSCC with ≥1 other feature). Tumors could meet ≥1 high-risk criteria. Randomization occurred within 2-11 wk after completion of RT. Data cutoff was April 7, 2025. Results: Among 415 pts (209/206 cemi/pbo) randomized, the DFS HR was 0.35 (95% CI, 0.23-0.55) at a median follow-up of 30 months. The most common high-risk criterion was nodal ECE, present in 48.4% of pts (201/415). DFS was improved with cemi vs pbo across all high-risk features, including both nodal and non-nodal criteria (Table 1). A consistent benefit was observed regardless of whether the interval between prior RT completion and study randomization was 2-6 wk (DFS events, 17/117 [14.5%] vs 37/112 [33.0%]; HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.22-0.70) or >6 wk (DFS events, 12/91 [13.2%] vs 31/93 [33.3%]; HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.19-0.71). Conclusions: In this phase 3 study, adjuvant cemi demonstrated a DFS benefit vs pbo across all high-risk features and regardless of the interval between prior RT completion and randomization. Clinical trial information: NCT03969004 . DFS with cemi vs pbo: Analyses per high-risk criteria. Criteria a Met high risk criteria, n/N (%) DFS events in cemi arm, n/N (%) DFS events in pbo arm, n/N (%) DFS HR (95% CI) Nodal high risk ECE with ≥1 node ≥20 mm 201/415 (48.4) 14/105 (13.3) 27/96 (28.1) 0.44 (0.23-0.84) ≥3 nodes 71/415 (17.1) 7/34 (20.6) 18/37 (48.6) 0.34 (0.13-0.92) Non-nodal high risk In-transit metastases 41/415 (9.9) 2/20 (10.0) 9/21 (42.9) 0.07 (0.01-0.58) T4 lesion 33/415 (8.0) 6/17 (35.3) 5/16 (31.3) 0.58 (0.16-2.11) Perineural invasion 64/415 (15.4) 3/32 (9.4) 8/32 (25.0) 0.27 (0.07-1.04) Recurrent CSCC with ≥1 additional high-risk criteria 105/415 (25.3) 9/55 (16.4) 22/50 (44.0) 0.19 (0.08-0.45) a Tumors could meet ≥1 high-risk criteria.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
Humanitas University (IT), Regeneron (United States) (US), Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre (AU), University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Wollongong Hospital (AU), Princess Alexandra Hospital (AU), Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital (AU), University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (DE), Centre for Cancer Biology (AU), Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital (AU), Cancer Care Services (US), Nebraska Cancer Specialists (US), Tokyo National Hospital (JP), IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital (IT), University of Lübeck (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.