Ethnicity-based comparative analysis of treatment endpoints of 30,000 HR+/HER2− metastatic breast cancer patients on CDK4/6 inhibitors (palbociclib/ribociclib/abemaciclib).

1085 Background: Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i), in combination with endocrine therapy, are the mainstay for HR+/HER- metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, ethnically diverse populations remain underrepresented in randomised clinical trials, limiting the ability to stratify by ethnicity. This meta-analysis utilises real-world evidence to compare treatment endpoints i.e., overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR) and adverse effects (AE) across ethnic groups. Methods: 116 studies from MEDLINE and Embase were included (Palbociclib: 67, Abemaciclib: 29, Ribociclib: 20). 31580 HR+/HER- MBC patients (Asian [AS]:22067; White [WH]: 8993; Black [BL]: 510) were included. Median survival and response rates were calculated using a random effects model to account for between-study variability. Parentheses represent 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: Pooled analysis shows disparities in efficacy and significant variation in haematological toxicity. Maximum mOS benefit for AS was on palbociclib (61.8mo) whereas for WH was ribociclib (63.9mo), primarily driven by long-term follow-up in MONALEESA. mPFS benefit was longest in BL patients on abemaciclib (17mo), WH patients on palbociclib (27.7mo), AS patients on ribociclib (25.2mo). ORR was highest for ribociclib across all ethnic groups (Table). Meta-regression indicated ethnicity was not a significant independent moderator of AE risk (p > 0.05). AS cohorts demonstrated the highest incidence of Grade 3+ neutropenia across all agents: Palbociclib (72.0%; 49.5–87.1), Abemaciclib (52.8%; 46.1-59.4), and Ribociclib (45.8%; 39.1-52.5; p < 0.0001). In contrast, WH and BL patients exhibited significantly lower G3+ neutropenia rates, ranging from 12.0% to 33.8% (p < 0.0001). AS patients also showed the highest rates of leukopenia and anaemia across all CDK4/6i. Conclusions: Our large-scale meta-analysis findings establish a novel, evidence-based ethnicity-informed CDK4/6i selection framework to optimize treatment endpoints in HR+/HER2- MBC patients. This highlights the urgent need for prospective trials focused on underrepresented populations to close the survival gap. Metric Subgroup Palbociclib Abemaciclib Ribociclib ORR (%) AS 34.0 (27-42) 28.7 (16.1-41.3) 52.4 (46.4-58.5) WH 34.0 (28-65) 41.9 (14.9-68.9) 44.9 (32.1-57.7) BL 25.0 (17-23) N/A 34.6 mPFS (mo) AS 21.0 13.0 25.2 WH 27.7 21.8 24.1 BL 14.1 17.0 10.8 mOS (mo) AS 61.8 25.2 58.7 WH 60.5 37.6 63.9

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.1085
Primary Topic
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ethnicity-based comparative analysis of treatment endpoints of 30,000 HR+/HER2− metastatic breast cancer patients on CDK4/6 inhibitors (palbociclib/ribociclib/abemaciclib).

Joecelyn Kirani Tan, Olubukola Ayodele, Akash Maniam, Isabella Koprivec et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
article

Ethnicity-based comparative analysis of treatment endpoints of 30,000 HR+/HER2− metastatic breast cancer patients on CDK4/6 inhibitors (palbociclib/ribociclib/abemaciclib).

Joecelyn Kirani Tan, Olubukola Ayodele, Akash Maniam, Isabella Koprivec, Adan Khan, Aruni Ghose, Yetunde Owoseni, Vahe Grigoryan, Ishikaa Mukherjee, Olivia Benny, Mariam Khachatryan, Patricia Lapitan, Alma Jbeili, Arissa Rachel James, Vriddhi Urs, Disha Khanna, Aaron Benedict, Debbie Deshna Sibartie Ramkeelawon, Sarah Adomah
article en

Abstract

1085 Background: Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i), in combination with endocrine therapy, are the mainstay for HR+/HER- metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, ethnically diverse populations remain underrepresented in randomised clinical trials, limiting the ability to stratify by ethnicity. This meta-analysis utilises real-world evidence to compare treatment endpoints i.e., overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR) and adverse effects (AE) across ethnic groups. Methods: 116 studies from MEDLINE and Embase were included (Palbociclib: 67, Abemaciclib: 29, Ribociclib: 20). 31580 HR+/HER- MBC patients (Asian [AS]:22067; White [WH]: 8993; Black [BL]: 510) were included. Median survival and response rates were calculated using a random effects model to account for between-study variability. Parentheses represent 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: Pooled analysis shows disparities in efficacy and significant variation in haematological toxicity. Maximum mOS benefit for AS was on palbociclib (61.8mo) whereas for WH was ribociclib (63.9mo), primarily driven by long-term follow-up in MONALEESA. mPFS benefit was longest in BL patients on abemaciclib (17mo), WH patients on palbociclib (27.7mo), AS patients on ribociclib (25.2mo). ORR was highest for ribociclib across all ethnic groups (Table). Meta-regression indicated ethnicity was not a significant independent moderator of AE risk (p > 0.05). AS cohorts demonstrated the highest incidence of Grade 3+ neutropenia across all agents: Palbociclib (72.0%; 49.5–87.1), Abemaciclib (52.8%; 46.1-59.4), and Ribociclib (45.8%; 39.1-52.5; p < 0.0001). In contrast, WH and BL patients exhibited significantly lower G3+ neutropenia rates, ranging from 12.0% to 33.8% (p < 0.0001). AS patients also showed the highest rates of leukopenia and anaemia across all CDK4/6i. Conclusions: Our large-scale meta-analysis findings establish a novel, evidence-based ethnicity-informed CDK4/6i selection framework to optimize treatment endpoints in HR+/HER2- MBC patients. This highlights the urgent need for prospective trials focused on underrepresented populations to close the survival gap. Metric Subgroup Palbociclib Abemaciclib Ribociclib ORR (%) AS 34.0 (27-42) 28.7 (16.1-41.3) 52.4 (46.4-58.5) WH 34.0 (28-65) 41.9 (14.9-68.9) 44.9 (32.1-57.7) BL 25.0 (17-23) N/A 34.6 mPFS (mo) AS 21.0 13.0 25.2 WH 27.7 21.8 24.1 BL 14.1 17.0 10.8 mOS (mo) AS 61.8 25.2 58.7 WH 60.5 37.6 63.9

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
St Bartholomew's Hospital (GB), Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University of Staffordshire (GB), University of Kent (GB), Barts Health NHS Trust (GB), London North West Healthcare NHS Trust (GB), Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), The Christie Hospital (GB), The Christie NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Croatian Science Foundation (HR), Staffordshire County Council (GB), CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence (GB), Wythenshawe Hospital (GB), NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre (GB), Keele University (GB), Yerevan State Medical University (AM), University of Buckingham (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.