Achieving epidemiologically representative enrollment and social determinants of health in the phase III evERA Breast Cancer study (NCT05306340).

1572 Background: Clinical trials have historically under-enrolled patients (pts) from racial and ethnic minority groups, resulting in study populations that do not reflect the epidemiology of cancer in the United States (US), limiting generalizability of the findings. In parallel, social determinants of health (SDOH) are increasingly recognized as key drivers of cancer outcomes, yet are infrequently collected in oncology trials due to operational, ethical, and privacy concerns. The Phase III evERA breast cancer (BC) study (Mayer et al ESMO 2025) was intentionally designed to address both challenges through proactive enrollment strategies and prospective SDOH data collection. Methods: evERA BC is a global study in pts with ER+, HER2– advanced BC. In the US, a multi-pronged operational strategy was implemented to achieve epidemiologically representative enrollment, including expanded and pragmatic eligibility criteria, prioritization of community-based sites, real-time enrollment monitoring, patient navigation and financial support, and advocacy partnerships. A tailored survey assessing 5 key social determinants of health (education, income, employment status, marital status, insurance type) was offered to US pts to support a protocol-specified exploratory SDOH efficacy objective. Results: The multifaceted operational enrollment strategy used in the evERA BC study resulted in a US cohort (n=144 of total accrual 373) whose racial and ethnic composition exceeded SEER epidemiologic distributions for ER+, HER2− advanced BC for African American (AA) (12.5% vs 11.1%), Asian (9% vs 5.7%), and Hispanic (H) pts of any race (16% vs 8.9%). Enrollment for the aggregate White race (71.5%) and non-Hispanic (NH) ethnicity (83.3%) categories were slightly lower than SEER estimates for White race (82.9%) and NH ethnicity (91.1%). These enrollment patterns contrast with historic Phase III BC trials, in which AA pts typically comprise <5% and H pts <9% of enrolled populations. Of the 144 U.S. evERA BC pts, 128 (89%) completed the optional SDOH survey, demonstrating feasibility of SDOH data collection in a clinical trial setting and informing evaluation of potential trends and associations with outcomes. Conclusions: The evERA study demonstrates that key operational strategies can achieve epidemiologically representative enrollment while enabling robust and compliant SDOH data collection in oncology clinical trials. These findings provide a practical roadmap for industry sponsors seeking to improve recruitment of underrepresented populations and to generate more clinically meaningful and generalizable evidence by integrating social context into trial design and data interpretation. Clinical trial information: NCT05306340 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.1572
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Achieving epidemiologically representative enrollment and social determinants of health in the phase III evERA Breast Cancer study (NCT05306340).

Jeffrey D. Neidhart, Ibrahim M. Abbass, Gregory A. Vidal, Erica L. Mayer et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
article

Achieving epidemiologically representative enrollment and social determinants of health in the phase III evERA Breast Cancer study (NCT05306340).

Jeffrey D. Neidhart, Ibrahim M. Abbass, Gregory A. Vidal, Erica L. Mayer, Katherine Tkaczuk, Lasika Seneviratne, Gillian DiLallo, Michael Danso, Bann-mo Day, Hope S. Rugo, Amy Vassel, Ines Joan Sanchez-Rivera, Georgia Litsas Dangel, Manisha Krishnamurthy, Amy Tiersten, Robin Aimee Herzog, Lauren Davis, Valarie Worthy, Ricki Fairley, Thomas Stark
article en

Abstract

1572 Background: Clinical trials have historically under-enrolled patients (pts) from racial and ethnic minority groups, resulting in study populations that do not reflect the epidemiology of cancer in the United States (US), limiting generalizability of the findings. In parallel, social determinants of health (SDOH) are increasingly recognized as key drivers of cancer outcomes, yet are infrequently collected in oncology trials due to operational, ethical, and privacy concerns. The Phase III evERA breast cancer (BC) study (Mayer et al ESMO 2025) was intentionally designed to address both challenges through proactive enrollment strategies and prospective SDOH data collection. Methods: evERA BC is a global study in pts with ER+, HER2– advanced BC. In the US, a multi-pronged operational strategy was implemented to achieve epidemiologically representative enrollment, including expanded and pragmatic eligibility criteria, prioritization of community-based sites, real-time enrollment monitoring, patient navigation and financial support, and advocacy partnerships. A tailored survey assessing 5 key social determinants of health (education, income, employment status, marital status, insurance type) was offered to US pts to support a protocol-specified exploratory SDOH efficacy objective. Results: The multifaceted operational enrollment strategy used in the evERA BC study resulted in a US cohort (n=144 of total accrual 373) whose racial and ethnic composition exceeded SEER epidemiologic distributions for ER+, HER2− advanced BC for African American (AA) (12.5% vs 11.1%), Asian (9% vs 5.7%), and Hispanic (H) pts of any race (16% vs 8.9%). Enrollment for the aggregate White race (71.5%) and non-Hispanic (NH) ethnicity (83.3%) categories were slightly lower than SEER estimates for White race (82.9%) and NH ethnicity (91.1%). These enrollment patterns contrast with historic Phase III BC trials, in which AA pts typically comprise <5% and H pts <9% of enrolled populations. Of the 144 U.S. evERA BC pts, 128 (89%) completed the optional SDOH survey, demonstrating feasibility of SDOH data collection in a clinical trial setting and informing evaluation of potential trends and associations with outcomes. Conclusions: The evERA study demonstrates that key operational strategies can achieve epidemiologically representative enrollment while enabling robust and compliant SDOH data collection in oncology clinical trials. These findings provide a practical roadmap for industry sponsors seeking to improve recruitment of underrepresented populations and to generate more clinically meaningful and generalizable evidence by integrating social context into trial design and data interpretation. Clinical trial information: NCT05306340 .

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US), The University of Texas at El Paso (US), Breast Cancer Alliance (US), University Medical Center of El Paso (US), Virginia Oncology Associates (US), Los Angeles Medical Center (US), West Cancer Center (US), City of Hope (US), San Juan Oncology Associates (US), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US), University of Baltimore (US), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Roche
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.