Reverse Triggering With and Without Breath Stacking During Pressure-Controlled Ventilation: Exposure Burden and Associations With Ventilation Outcomes

Background: Reverse triggering is a complex form of asynchrony with different phenotypes. The exposure burden and clinical outcomes of reverse triggering during pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) are underexplored. We aimed at determining the incidence of reverse triggering and characterizing the impact of breath-stacking. Methods: This was a prospective, observational analysis. Adult subjects with PCV under long-term monitoring were included. The primary outcome was duration of invasive mechanical ventilation. Secondary outcomes included changes in mechanics and tidal volumes associated with breath-stacking, factors correlated with increased frequency of reverse triggering, and testing for thresholds of volume, which could be associated with harm. Results: Among 429 subjects with PCV and >24 h of usable waveform recording, 174 subjects (40.6%) were found to have reverse triggering, and 80 subjects had reverse triggering with breath-stacking. Reverse triggering with breath-stacking was associated with higher peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) (15.4 [14.3–17.0] versus 13.7 [11.4, 15.0] cm H 2 O, P < .001), driving pressure (ΔP) [8.5(7.5,10.0) versus 7.0(5.8,9.0) cm H 2 O, P < .001] and longer duration of invasive mechanical ventilation [7(3,15) versus 4(2,7) days, P = .015]. Higher level of ΔP (odds ratio [OR] = 1.49, 95% CI: 1.06–2.11, P = .02) and tidal volume (OR = 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01–1.03, P < .001), more fentanyl infusion (OR,1.19, 95% CI: 1.17–1.20, P = .033) and lower value of P aO 2 /F IO 2 (OR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.98–1.00, P = .02) were risk factors possibly related to reverse triggering with breath-stacking. Receiver operating characteristic analysis suggests that a breath-stacked volume threshold of 141 mL might be associated with prolonged invasive mechanical ventilation. Conclusions: Reverse triggering with breath-stacking during PCV was characterized by higher PIP, ΔP, and longer duration of invasive mechanical ventilation. Larger volumes with breath-stacking may be associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation. Fentanyl usage and worse P aO 2 /F IO 2 were risk factors related to reverse triggering with breath-stacking.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Respiratory Care
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/19433654261447873
Primary Topic
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reverse Triggering With and Without Breath Stacking During Pressure-Controlled Ventilation: Exposure Burden and Associations With Ventilation Outcomes

Haoping Huang, Y T, ELIAS BAEDORF KASSIS, Siyi Yuan et al.
Respiratory Care
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
article

Reverse Triggering With and Without Breath Stacking During Pressure-Controlled Ventilation: Exposure Burden and Associations With Ventilation Outcomes

Haoping Huang, Y T, ELIAS BAEDORF KASSIS, Siyi Yuan, Fuhong Cai, Yingying Yang, Alper Gulluoglu, Ma Yx, Weida Liu, Y Long, D S Talmor, L Su, Huaiwu He, Zhangwei Song, Song Zhang
article en

Abstract

Background: Reverse triggering is a complex form of asynchrony with different phenotypes. The exposure burden and clinical outcomes of reverse triggering during pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) are underexplored. We aimed at determining the incidence of reverse triggering and characterizing the impact of breath-stacking. Methods: This was a prospective, observational analysis. Adult subjects with PCV under long-term monitoring were included. The primary outcome was duration of invasive mechanical ventilation. Secondary outcomes included changes in mechanics and tidal volumes associated with breath-stacking, factors correlated with increased frequency of reverse triggering, and testing for thresholds of volume, which could be associated with harm. Results: Among 429 subjects with PCV and >24 h of usable waveform recording, 174 subjects (40.6%) were found to have reverse triggering, and 80 subjects had reverse triggering with breath-stacking. Reverse triggering with breath-stacking was associated with higher peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) (15.4 [14.3–17.0] versus 13.7 [11.4, 15.0] cm H 2 O, P < .001), driving pressure (ΔP) [8.5(7.5,10.0) versus 7.0(5.8,9.0) cm H 2 O, P < .001] and longer duration of invasive mechanical ventilation [7(3,15) versus 4(2,7) days, P = .015]. Higher level of ΔP (odds ratio [OR] = 1.49, 95% CI: 1.06–2.11, P = .02) and tidal volume (OR = 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01–1.03, P < .001), more fentanyl infusion (OR,1.19, 95% CI: 1.17–1.20, P = .033) and lower value of P aO 2 /F IO 2 (OR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.98–1.00, P = .02) were risk factors possibly related to reverse triggering with breath-stacking. Receiver operating characteristic analysis suggests that a breath-stacked volume threshold of 141 mL might be associated with prolonged invasive mechanical ventilation. Conclusions: Reverse triggering with breath-stacking during PCV was characterized by higher PIP, ΔP, and longer duration of invasive mechanical ventilation. Larger volumes with breath-stacking may be associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation. Fentanyl usage and worse P aO 2 /F IO 2 were risk factors related to reverse triggering with breath-stacking.

Respiratory Care
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US), Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University (CN), Outcomes Research Consortium (US), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN), Peking Union Medical College Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.