Deserving, Desirable and Undesirable Migrants: How Routes of Entry Affect Access to Housing Support and Impact Wellbeing

This paper discusses emerging findings from a large-scale, ongoing UKRI-funded study (2024–2027) undertaken in twelve diverse areas of England. While the main project focuses on reducing health inequalities for refugees, asylum seekers and migrant populations, this interim paper focuses on emerging evidence related to the question of how perceptions of deservingness and route of entry link to access to housing and support services available to the four main refugee and asylum seeker groups who are the predominant focus within the wider research study. We argue that the level and type of support received and access to housing have a direct impact on the wellbeing of the populations. Housing is one of the key social determinants of health, with impacts on both mental health and broader wellbeing. Our findings show that nationality, together with route of entry, legal status and eligibility for statutory support (or lack thereof), clearly affects housing pathways. This, in turn, impacts on the likelihood of being housed in temporary/dispersal accommodation, as well as experiencing homelessness and longer-term housing precarity. These are factors which are widely recognised as affecting mental health and wellbeing as well as the ability to receive uninterrupted health care for other conditions. This study explores how vulnerability, desirability, and deservingness shape different trajectories of refugee housing and resettlement and the resultant impacts on different migrant populations.