CheckMate-901: Association of tumor and peripheral biomarker profiles with durable disease control in metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab.

4525 Background: Patients (pts) with untreated, unresectable, or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) have limited therapeutic options and poor prognosis. The phase 3, global, open-label, randomized CheckMate 901 trial compared nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO+IPI) vs gemcitabine–carboplatin/gemcitabine–cisplatin (gem–carbo/gem–cis) with previously untreated unresectable or mUC. A subset of pts treated with NIVO+IPI experienced durable disease control. This exploratory analysis seeks to identify biomarkers that might characterize pts deriving particular benefit from NIVO+IPI. Methods: Serum samples from CheckMate 901 (NIVO+IPI, n = 288–300; gem–carbo/gem–cis, n = 222–236) underwent multiplex analysis at Myriad RBM using Luminex and Simoa technology. Pts were stratified by progression-free survival (<8 months [early progressor; EP] vs ≥8 months [durable benefit; DB]), and clinical laboratory variables (granulocyte count [GRANC], hemoglobin [HB], thyroid-stimulating hormone [TSH], neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio [NLR]) and cytokine/protein biomarkers (alpha-1 antitrypsin [AAT], beta2-microglobulin [B2M], C-reactive protein [CRP], ferritin [FRTN], interleukin [IL]-2 receptor alpha [IL-2ra], IL-8, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 [VCAM-1], and von Willebrand factor [vWF]) were compared in EP vs DB pts. In addition, tumor RNA-seq was used for gene signature analysis (NIVO+IPI, n = 134; gem–carbo/gem–cis, n = 117), including 8-gene epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT)/stroma core, 9-gene transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ) activation, 13-gene high-risk TGFβ, and cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4). Results: Distinct biomarker patterns emerged between EP and DB pts. Pts achieving DB vs EP with NIVO+IPI exhibited significantly lower levels of GRANC, TSH, and NLR, and higher HB (all P < 0.05). Similarly, levels of proteins AAT, B2M, CRP, FRTN, IL-2ra, IL-8, VCAM-1, and vWF were significantly lower in NIVO+IPI-treated pts achieving DB vs EP (all P < 0.05). RNA-seq analysis showed significant differences between NIVO+IPI-treated pts achieving DB vs EP for 8 EMT/stroma core and 9 TGFβ activation ( P < 0.05). Conclusions: In untreated, unresectable, or mUC, distinct clinical and cytokine/protein biomarker profiles were associated with DB vs EP with NIVO+IPI therapy. Pts with EP exhibit features in the tumor microenvironment and circulation suggestive of tumor-promoting inflammation, several of which have been linked to resistance to immune checkpoint blockade in prior analyses. These findings underscore the heterogeneity of mUC and the potential of routinely measured circulating analytes for risk stratification and treatment decisions. Prospective studies should confirm their clinical applicability. Clinical trial information: NCT03036098 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.4525
Primary Topic
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CheckMate-901: Association of tumor and peripheral biomarker profiles with durable disease control in metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab.

Guru Sonpavde, Jeiry Filian, L Wang, Akshay Yadav et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
article

CheckMate-901: Association of tumor and peripheral biomarker profiles with durable disease control in metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab.

Guru Sonpavde, Jeiry Filian, L Wang, Akshay Yadav, Diego G. Chowell, Saurabh Gupta, Matthew D. Galsky, Michiel S. Van Der Heijden, Thomas Powles
article en

Abstract

4525 Background: Patients (pts) with untreated, unresectable, or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) have limited therapeutic options and poor prognosis. The phase 3, global, open-label, randomized CheckMate 901 trial compared nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO+IPI) vs gemcitabine–carboplatin/gemcitabine–cisplatin (gem–carbo/gem–cis) with previously untreated unresectable or mUC. A subset of pts treated with NIVO+IPI experienced durable disease control. This exploratory analysis seeks to identify biomarkers that might characterize pts deriving particular benefit from NIVO+IPI. Methods: Serum samples from CheckMate 901 (NIVO+IPI, n = 288–300; gem–carbo/gem–cis, n = 222–236) underwent multiplex analysis at Myriad RBM using Luminex and Simoa technology. Pts were stratified by progression-free survival (<8 months [early progressor; EP] vs ≥8 months [durable benefit; DB]), and clinical laboratory variables (granulocyte count [GRANC], hemoglobin [HB], thyroid-stimulating hormone [TSH], neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio [NLR]) and cytokine/protein biomarkers (alpha-1 antitrypsin [AAT], beta2-microglobulin [B2M], C-reactive protein [CRP], ferritin [FRTN], interleukin [IL]-2 receptor alpha [IL-2ra], IL-8, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 [VCAM-1], and von Willebrand factor [vWF]) were compared in EP vs DB pts. In addition, tumor RNA-seq was used for gene signature analysis (NIVO+IPI, n = 134; gem–carbo/gem–cis, n = 117), including 8-gene epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT)/stroma core, 9-gene transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ) activation, 13-gene high-risk TGFβ, and cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4). Results: Distinct biomarker patterns emerged between EP and DB pts. Pts achieving DB vs EP with NIVO+IPI exhibited significantly lower levels of GRANC, TSH, and NLR, and higher HB (all P < 0.05). Similarly, levels of proteins AAT, B2M, CRP, FRTN, IL-2ra, IL-8, VCAM-1, and vWF were significantly lower in NIVO+IPI-treated pts achieving DB vs EP (all P < 0.05). RNA-seq analysis showed significant differences between NIVO+IPI-treated pts achieving DB vs EP for 8 EMT/stroma core and 9 TGFβ activation ( P < 0.05). Conclusions: In untreated, unresectable, or mUC, distinct clinical and cytokine/protein biomarker profiles were associated with DB vs EP with NIVO+IPI therapy. Pts with EP exhibit features in the tumor microenvironment and circulation suggestive of tumor-promoting inflammation, several of which have been linked to resistance to immune checkpoint blockade in prior analyses. These findings underscore the heterogeneity of mUC and the potential of routinely measured circulating analytes for risk stratification and treatment decisions. Prospective studies should confirm their clinical applicability. Clinical trial information: NCT03036098 .

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
Harvard University (US), Queen Mary University of London (GB), Dutch Cancer Society (NL), The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NL), Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States) (US), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US), Bristol-Myers Squibb (India) (IN), Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.