A Geospatial Analysis of State-Level Access to Registered U.S. Replantation Centers

BACKGROUND: Following traumatic finger amputation, successful replantation depends on several preoperative factors, with proximity to a registered hand trauma center being a key determinant. These centers represent the standard for treatment, making timely access within a critical window essential. Research has demonstrated that increased travel distances and longer times to replantation correlate with poorer functional outcomes. METHODS: Using data from the American Society for Surgery of the Hand, the locations of registered hand trauma centers were mapped with advanced isochrone application programming interface modeling software, which uses complex algorithms to map and analyze areas reachable within specific time or distance thresholds. A shaded region was generated to indicate areas within a 6-hour and 12-hour travel radius of a registered hospital center. RESULTS: The District of Columbia (1.5), Oklahoma (0.98), and Minnesota (0.88) had the highest number of trauma centers per 1 million residents, whereas multiple states such as Nevada, Montana, and Kansas had 0 trauma centers. In terms of geospatial mapping, regions such as Houston, Texas; Indianapolis, Indiana; Columbus and Cincinnati, Ohio; and large cities in the Northeast such as New York, Philadelphia, the District of Columbia, and Boston, all have greater than 6 hand trauma centers. At a 6-hour catchment, 13.3% of the U.S. population lacks access to a registered hand trauma center; even when extended to 12 hours, 7.6% remain without coverage. CONCLUSIONS: Limited hospital and trauma center density remains a significant barrier to high-quality surgical care. Reducing travel times, increasing access in rural areas, and improving urban infrastructure could enhance replantation outcomes by ensuring that more patients reach registered hand trauma centers within the critical time window.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000012630
Primary Topic
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Geospatial Analysis of State-Level Access to Registered U.S. Replantation Centers

Jeffrey E. Janis, David A. Febre-Alemañy, Sacha C. Hauc, Andrea C. Lin et al.
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
article

A Geospatial Analysis of State-Level Access to Registered U.S. Replantation Centers

Jeffrey E. Janis, David A. Febre-Alemañy, Sacha C. Hauc, Andrea C. Lin, Julia E.P. Atayde
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Following traumatic finger amputation, successful replantation depends on several preoperative factors, with proximity to a registered hand trauma center being a key determinant. These centers represent the standard for treatment, making timely access within a critical window essential. Research has demonstrated that increased travel distances and longer times to replantation correlate with poorer functional outcomes. METHODS: Using data from the American Society for Surgery of the Hand, the locations of registered hand trauma centers were mapped with advanced isochrone application programming interface modeling software, which uses complex algorithms to map and analyze areas reachable within specific time or distance thresholds. A shaded region was generated to indicate areas within a 6-hour and 12-hour travel radius of a registered hospital center. RESULTS: The District of Columbia (1.5), Oklahoma (0.98), and Minnesota (0.88) had the highest number of trauma centers per 1 million residents, whereas multiple states such as Nevada, Montana, and Kansas had 0 trauma centers. In terms of geospatial mapping, regions such as Houston, Texas; Indianapolis, Indiana; Columbus and Cincinnati, Ohio; and large cities in the Northeast such as New York, Philadelphia, the District of Columbia, and Boston, all have greater than 6 hand trauma centers. At a 6-hour catchment, 13.3% of the U.S. population lacks access to a registered hand trauma center; even when extended to 12 hours, 7.6% remain without coverage. CONCLUSIONS: Limited hospital and trauma center density remains a significant barrier to high-quality surgical care. Reducing travel times, increasing access in rural areas, and improving urban infrastructure could enhance replantation outcomes by ensuring that more patients reach registered hand trauma centers within the critical time window.

Plastic & Reconstructive SurgeryVol. 157(6)
The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (US), San Juan Bautista School of Medicine (PR), Temple University Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.