An integrated hybrid HAZOP and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process framework for enhanced safety risk prioritization in process industries

Safety risk assessment is crucial for managing hazards in chemical process industries. This study aimed to develop and validate a semi-quantitative risk assessment method, termed HAZOP+, tailored for these industries. The research was conducted in 2025 using a multi-phase approach. A two-stage Delphi survey involving 41 domain experts was carried out to identify and validate relevant risk factors. Subsequently, the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) was employed to establish hierarchical relationships among the factors and assign relative weights. The proposed HAZOP+ model was validated through a reality check, a field study in a large-scale chemical process industry, and an independent peer review. Severity factors (weight 0.602) influenced overall risk more than probability factors (0.337). Key severity sub-factors were human injury (0.199) and operational interruption (0.191); key probability sub-factors were reliability (0.190) and redundancy (0.179). The model showed strong content validity (CVR = 0.805, CVI = 0.927) and reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.88). In the case study, HAZOP+ provided more precise risk estimations than traditional HAZOP, especially for high-risk scenarios. The HAZOP+ method effectively enhances traditional HAZOP from a qualitative risk identification tool into a semi-quantitative risk assessment and ranking framework. By integrating expert consensus through the Delphi method, hierarchical weighting using fuzzy AHP, and practical validation, it addresses the subjectivity and qualitative limitations of conventional approaches. This technique enables safety professionals to more effectively identify, evaluate, and prioritize risks, ultimately enhancing operational safety and optimizing resource allocation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-46519-5
Primary Topic
Risk and Safety Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An integrated hybrid HAZOP and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process framework for enhanced safety risk prioritization in process industries

Ahmad Soltanzadeh, Mohsen Mahdinia, Mohsen Sadeghi-Yarandi
Scientific Reports
Risk and Safety Analysis
article

An integrated hybrid HAZOP and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process framework for enhanced safety risk prioritization in process industries

Ahmad Soltanzadeh, Mohsen Mahdinia, Mohsen Sadeghi-Yarandi
article en

Abstract

Safety risk assessment is crucial for managing hazards in chemical process industries. This study aimed to develop and validate a semi-quantitative risk assessment method, termed HAZOP+, tailored for these industries. The research was conducted in 2025 using a multi-phase approach. A two-stage Delphi survey involving 41 domain experts was carried out to identify and validate relevant risk factors. Subsequently, the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) was employed to establish hierarchical relationships among the factors and assign relative weights. The proposed HAZOP+ model was validated through a reality check, a field study in a large-scale chemical process industry, and an independent peer review. Severity factors (weight 0.602) influenced overall risk more than probability factors (0.337). Key severity sub-factors were human injury (0.199) and operational interruption (0.191); key probability sub-factors were reliability (0.190) and redundancy (0.179). The model showed strong content validity (CVR = 0.805, CVI = 0.927) and reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.88). In the case study, HAZOP+ provided more precise risk estimations than traditional HAZOP, especially for high-risk scenarios. The HAZOP+ method effectively enhances traditional HAZOP from a qualitative risk identification tool into a semi-quantitative risk assessment and ranking framework. By integrating expert consensus through the Delphi method, hierarchical weighting using fuzzy AHP, and practical validation, it addresses the subjectivity and qualitative limitations of conventional approaches. This technique enables safety professionals to more effectively identify, evaluate, and prioritize risks, ultimately enhancing operational safety and optimizing resource allocation.

Scientific Reports
University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences (IR), Qom University of Medical Science and Health Services (IR)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Risk and Safety Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.