Updating the critical steps of the quality implementation framework: an umbrella review of reviews

BACKGROUND: The Quality Implementation Framework (QIF) is a widely used process model in implementation science (IS). Since its publication in 2012, the field of IS has expanded considerably, yet QIF has never undergone formal revision. Given recent advances and the complexity in implementation research and practice, this study examines whether QIF continues to capture the full scope of implementation quality and its challenges. METHODS: An umbrella review of reviews was conducted on literature published between 2012 and 2025. Eligible articles reported on the development, application, or update of implementation frameworks within healthcare or social science. Data were deductively mapped to the four phases and 14 steps of the original QIF and inductively mapped to identify knowledge not included in the original framework. RESULTS: A total of 15 reviews met the inclusion criteria. Most aligned with the core structure of QIF, supporting its continued relevance. However, several reviews highlighted the need to add a pre-implementation phase focusing on evidence appraisal, and a post-implementation phase addressing sustainability. Four cross-cutting domains (service user, intervention deliverer, context, and technology) were identified as critical factors throughout the implementation process. CONCLUSIONS: An updated version of QIF is proposed, building on the original framework while introducing two new phases and four cross-cutting domains. This expanded model reflects recent developments in the literature and provides more comprehensive guidance to support implementation across complex real-world settings; it has important implications for implementation research and implementation practice. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023475994.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Implementation Science Communications
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-026-00954-7
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Updating the critical steps of the quality implementation framework: an umbrella review of reviews

Anne Gulbech Ording, Søren Paaske Johnsen, Julie Midtgaard, Samantha Spanos et al.
Implementation Science Communications
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

Updating the critical steps of the quality implementation framework: an umbrella review of reviews

Anne Gulbech Ording, Søren Paaske Johnsen, Julie Midtgaard, Samantha Spanos, Georgia Fisher, Martin Jorsal, Abraham Wandersman, Jeffrey Braithwaite, Kathrine Hald, Louise A. Ellis, Lisa Pagano
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Quality Implementation Framework (QIF) is a widely used process model in implementation science (IS). Since its publication in 2012, the field of IS has expanded considerably, yet QIF has never undergone formal revision. Given recent advances and the complexity in implementation research and practice, this study examines whether QIF continues to capture the full scope of implementation quality and its challenges. METHODS: An umbrella review of reviews was conducted on literature published between 2012 and 2025. Eligible articles reported on the development, application, or update of implementation frameworks within healthcare or social science. Data were deductively mapped to the four phases and 14 steps of the original QIF and inductively mapped to identify knowledge not included in the original framework. RESULTS: A total of 15 reviews met the inclusion criteria. Most aligned with the core structure of QIF, supporting its continued relevance. However, several reviews highlighted the need to add a pre-implementation phase focusing on evidence appraisal, and a post-implementation phase addressing sustainability. Four cross-cutting domains (service user, intervention deliverer, context, and technology) were identified as critical factors throughout the implementation process. CONCLUSIONS: An updated version of QIF is proposed, building on the original framework while introducing two new phases and four cross-cutting domains. This expanded model reflects recent developments in the literature and provides more comprehensive guidance to support implementation across complex real-world settings; it has important implications for implementation research and implementation practice. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023475994.

Implementation Science Communications
University of Copenhagen (DK), University of South Carolina (US), Aalborg University Hospital (DK), Hvidovre Hospital (DK), Regionshospitalet Silkeborg (DK), Aalborg University (DK), Macquarie University (AU)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.